Initial commit from Specify template

.opencode/command/speckit.analyze.md

@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+---
+description: Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before analysis)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_analyze` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Goal.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Goal
+
+Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (`spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/speckit.tasks` has successfully produced a complete `tasks.md`.
+
+## Operating Constraints
+
+**STRICTLY READ-ONLY**: Do **not** modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
+
+**Constitution Authority**: The project constitution (`.specify/memory/constitution.md`) is **non-negotiable** within this analysis scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a separate, explicit constitution update outside `/speckit.analyze`.
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+### 1. Initialize Analysis Context
+
+Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
+
+- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
+- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
+- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
+
+Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command).
+For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+### 2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
+
+Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
+
+**From spec.md:**
+
+- Overview/Context
+- Functional Requirements
+- Success Criteria (measurable outcomes — e.g., performance, security, availability, user success, business impact)
+- User Stories
+- Edge Cases (if present)
+
+**From plan.md:**
+
+- Architecture/stack choices
+- Data Model references
+- Phases
+- Technical constraints
+
+**From tasks.md:**
+
+- Task IDs
+- Descriptions
+- Phase grouping
+- Parallel markers [P]
+- Referenced file paths
+
+**From constitution:**
+
+- Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for principle validation
+
+### 3. Build Semantic Models
+
+Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
+
+- **Requirements inventory**: For each Functional Requirement (FR-###) and Success Criterion (SC-###), record a stable key. Use the explicit FR-/SC- identifier as the primary key when present, and optionally also derive an imperative-phrase slug for readability (e.g., "User can upload file" → `user-can-upload-file`). Include only Success Criteria items that require buildable work (e.g., load-testing infrastructure, security audit tooling), and exclude post-launch outcome metrics and business KPIs (e.g., "Reduce support tickets by 50%").
+- **User story/action inventory**: Discrete user actions with acceptance criteria
+- **Task coverage mapping**: Map each task to one or more requirements or stories (inference by keyword / explicit reference patterns like IDs or key phrases)
+- **Constitution rule set**: Extract principle names and MUST/SHOULD normative statements
+
+### 4. Detection Passes (Token-Efficient Analysis)
+
+Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
+
+#### A. Duplication Detection
+
+- Identify near-duplicate requirements
+- Mark lower-quality phrasing for consolidation
+
+#### B. Ambiguity Detection
+
+- Flag vague adjectives (fast, scalable, secure, intuitive, robust) lacking measurable criteria
+- Flag unresolved placeholders (TODO, TKTK, ???, `<placeholder>`, etc.)
+
+#### C. Underspecification
+
+- Requirements with verbs but missing object or measurable outcome
+- User stories missing acceptance criteria alignment
+- Tasks referencing files or components not defined in spec/plan
+
+#### D. Constitution Alignment
+
+- Any requirement or plan element conflicting with a MUST principle
+- Missing mandated sections or quality gates from constitution
+
+#### E. Coverage Gaps
+
+- Requirements with zero associated tasks
+- Tasks with no mapped requirement/story
+- Success Criteria requiring buildable work (performance, security, availability) not reflected in tasks
+
+#### F. Inconsistency
+
+- Terminology drift (same concept named differently across files)
+- Data entities referenced in plan but absent in spec (or vice versa)
+- Task ordering contradictions (e.g., integration tasks before foundational setup tasks without dependency note)
+- Conflicting requirements (e.g., one requires Next.js while other specifies Vue)
+
+### 5. Severity Assignment
+
+Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
+
+- **CRITICAL**: Violates constitution MUST, missing core spec artifact, or requirement with zero coverage that blocks baseline functionality
+- **HIGH**: Duplicate or conflicting requirement, ambiguous security/performance attribute, untestable acceptance criterion
+- **MEDIUM**: Terminology drift, missing non-functional task coverage, underspecified edge case
+- **LOW**: Style/wording improvements, minor redundancy not affecting execution order
+
+### 6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
+
+Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
+
+## Specification Analysis Report
+
+| ID | Category | Severity | Location(s) | Summary | Recommendation |
+|----|----------|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
+| A1 | Duplication | HIGH | spec.md:L120-134 | Two similar requirements ... | Merge phrasing; keep clearer version |
+
+(Add one row per finding; generate stable IDs prefixed by category initial.)
+
+**Coverage Summary Table:**
+
+| Requirement Key | Has Task? | Task IDs | Notes |
+|-----------------|-----------|----------|-------|
+
+**Constitution Alignment Issues:** (if any)
+
+**Unmapped Tasks:** (if any)
+
+**Metrics:**
+
+- Total Requirements
+- Total Tasks
+- Coverage % (requirements with >=1 task)
+- Ambiguity Count
+- Duplication Count
+- Critical Issues Count
+
+### 7. Provide Next Actions
+
+At end of report, output a concise Next Actions block:
+
+- If CRITICAL issues exist: Recommend resolving before `/speckit.implement`
+- If only LOW/MEDIUM: User may proceed, but provide improvement suggestions
+- Provide explicit command suggestions: e.g., "Run /speckit.specify with refinement", "Run /speckit.plan to adjust architecture", "Manually edit tasks.md to add coverage for 'performance-metrics'"
+
+### 8. Offer Remediation
+
+Ask the user: "Would you like me to suggest concrete remediation edits for the top N issues?" (Do NOT apply them automatically.)
+
+### 9. Check for extension hooks
+
+After reporting, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_analyze` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Operating Principles
+
+### Context Efficiency
+
+- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings, not exhaustive documentation
+- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally; don't dump all content into analysis
+- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
+- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes should produce consistent IDs and counts
+
+### Analysis Guidelines
+
+- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
+- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
+- **Prioritize constitution violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
+- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances, not generic patterns)
+- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
+
+## Context
+
+$ARGUMENTS

.opencode/command/speckit.checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,361 @@
+---
+description: Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
+---
+
+## Checklist Purpose: "Unit Tests for English"
+
+**CRITICAL CONCEPT**: Checklists are **UNIT TESTS FOR REQUIREMENTS WRITING** - they validate the quality, clarity, and completeness of requirements in a given domain.
+
+**NOT for verification/testing**:
+
+- ❌ NOT "Verify the button clicks correctly"
+- ❌ NOT "Test error handling works"
+- ❌ NOT "Confirm the API returns 200"
+- ❌ NOT checking if code/implementation matches the spec
+
+**FOR requirements quality validation**:
+
+- ✅ "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined for all card types?" (completeness)
+- ✅ "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" (clarity)
+- ✅ "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" (consistency)
+- ✅ "Are accessibility requirements defined for keyboard navigation?" (coverage)
+- ✅ "Does the spec define what happens when logo image fails to load?" (edge cases)
+
+**Metaphor**: If your spec is code written in English, the checklist is its unit test suite. You're testing whether the requirements are well-written, complete, unambiguous, and ready for implementation - NOT whether the implementation works.
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before checklist generation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_checklist` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Execution Steps.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list.
+   - All file paths must be absolute.
+   - For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Clarify intent (dynamic)**: Derive up to THREE initial contextual clarifying questions (no pre-baked catalog). They MUST:
+   - Be generated from the user's phrasing + extracted signals from spec/plan/tasks
+   - Only ask about information that materially changes checklist content
+   - Be skipped individually if already unambiguous in `$ARGUMENTS`
+   - Prefer precision over breadth
+
+   Generation algorithm:
+   1. Extract signals: feature domain keywords (e.g., auth, latency, UX, API), risk indicators ("critical", "must", "compliance"), stakeholder hints ("QA", "review", "security team"), and explicit deliverables ("a11y", "rollback", "contracts").
+   2. Cluster signals into candidate focus areas (max 4) ranked by relevance.
+   3. Identify probable audience & timing (author, reviewer, QA, release) if not explicit.
+   4. Detect missing dimensions: scope breadth, depth/rigor, risk emphasis, exclusion boundaries, measurable acceptance criteria.
+   5. Formulate questions chosen from these archetypes:
+      - Scope refinement (e.g., "Should this include integration touchpoints with X and Y or stay limited to local module correctness?")
+      - Risk prioritization (e.g., "Which of these potential risk areas should receive mandatory gating checks?")
+      - Depth calibration (e.g., "Is this a lightweight pre-commit sanity list or a formal release gate?")
+      - Audience framing (e.g., "Will this be used by the author only or peers during PR review?")
+      - Boundary exclusion (e.g., "Should we explicitly exclude performance tuning items this round?")
+      - Scenario class gap (e.g., "No recovery flows detected—are rollback / partial failure paths in scope?")
+
+   Question formatting rules:
+   - If presenting options, generate a compact table with columns: Option | Candidate | Why It Matters
+   - Limit to A–E options maximum; omit table if a free-form answer is clearer
+   - Never ask the user to restate what they already said
+   - Avoid speculative categories (no hallucination). If uncertain, ask explicitly: "Confirm whether X belongs in scope."
+
+   Defaults when interaction impossible:
+   - Depth: Standard
+   - Audience: Reviewer (PR) if code-related; Author otherwise
+   - Focus: Top 2 relevance clusters
+
+   Output the questions (label Q1/Q2/Q3). After answers: if ≥2 scenario classes (Alternate / Exception / Recovery / Non-Functional domain) remain unclear, you MAY ask up to TWO more targeted follow‑ups (Q4/Q5) with a one-line justification each (e.g., "Unresolved recovery path risk"). Do not exceed five total questions. Skip escalation if user explicitly declines more.
+
+3. **Understand user request**: Combine `$ARGUMENTS` + clarifying answers:
+   - Derive checklist theme (e.g., security, review, deploy, ux)
+   - Consolidate explicit must-have items mentioned by user
+   - Map focus selections to category scaffolding
+   - Infer any missing context from spec/plan/tasks (do NOT hallucinate)
+
+4. **Load feature context**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
+   - spec.md: Feature requirements and scope
+   - plan.md (if exists): Technical details, dependencies
+   - tasks.md (if exists): Implementation tasks
+
+   **Context Loading Strategy**:
+   - Load only necessary portions relevant to active focus areas (avoid full-file dumping)
+   - Prefer summarizing long sections into concise scenario/requirement bullets
+   - Use progressive disclosure: add follow-on retrieval only if gaps detected
+   - If source docs are large, generate interim summary items instead of embedding raw text
+
+5. **Generate checklist** - Create "Unit Tests for Requirements":
+   - Create `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/` directory if it doesn't exist
+   - Generate unique checklist filename:
+     - Use short, descriptive name based on domain (e.g., `ux.md`, `api.md`, `security.md`)
+     - Format: `[domain].md`
+   - File handling behavior:
+     - If file does NOT exist: Create new file and number items starting from CHK001
+     - If file exists: Append new items to existing file, continuing from the last CHK ID (e.g., if last item is CHK015, start new items at CHK016)
+   - Never delete or replace existing checklist content - always preserve and append
+
+   **CORE PRINCIPLE - Test the Requirements, Not the Implementation**:
+   Every checklist item MUST evaluate the REQUIREMENTS THEMSELVES for:
+   - **Completeness**: Are all necessary requirements present?
+   - **Clarity**: Are requirements unambiguous and specific?
+   - **Consistency**: Do requirements align with each other?
+   - **Measurability**: Can requirements be objectively verified?
+   - **Coverage**: Are all scenarios/edge cases addressed?
+
+   **Category Structure** - Group items by requirement quality dimensions:
+   - **Requirement Completeness** (Are all necessary requirements documented?)
+   - **Requirement Clarity** (Are requirements specific and unambiguous?)
+   - **Requirement Consistency** (Do requirements align without conflicts?)
+   - **Acceptance Criteria Quality** (Are success criteria measurable?)
+   - **Scenario Coverage** (Are all flows/cases addressed?)
+   - **Edge Case Coverage** (Are boundary conditions defined?)
+   - **Non-Functional Requirements** (Performance, Security, Accessibility, etc. - are they specified?)
+   - **Dependencies & Assumptions** (Are they documented and validated?)
+   - **Ambiguities & Conflicts** (What needs clarification?)
+
+   **HOW TO WRITE CHECKLIST ITEMS - "Unit Tests for English"**:
+
+   ❌ **WRONG** (Testing implementation):
+   - "Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards"
+   - "Test hover states work on desktop"
+   - "Confirm logo click navigates home"
+
+   ✅ **CORRECT** (Testing requirements quality):
+   - "Are the exact number and layout of featured episodes specified?" [Completeness]
+   - "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" [Clarity]
+   - "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" [Consistency]
+   - "Are keyboard navigation requirements defined for all interactive UI?" [Coverage]
+   - "Is the fallback behavior specified when logo image fails to load?" [Edge Cases]
+   - "Are loading states defined for asynchronous episode data?" [Completeness]
+   - "Does the spec define visual hierarchy for competing UI elements?" [Clarity]
+
+   **ITEM STRUCTURE**:
+   Each item should follow this pattern:
+   - Question format asking about requirement quality
+   - Focus on what's WRITTEN (or not written) in the spec/plan
+   - Include quality dimension in brackets [Completeness/Clarity/Consistency/etc.]
+   - Reference spec section `[Spec §X.Y]` when checking existing requirements
+   - Use `[Gap]` marker when checking for missing requirements
+
+   **EXAMPLES BY QUALITY DIMENSION**:
+
+   Completeness:
+   - "Are error handling requirements defined for all API failure modes? [Gap]"
+   - "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Completeness]"
+   - "Are mobile breakpoint requirements defined for responsive layouts? [Gap]"
+
+   Clarity:
+   - "Is 'fast loading' quantified with specific timing thresholds? [Clarity, Spec §NFR-2]"
+   - "Are 'related episodes' selection criteria explicitly defined? [Clarity, Spec §FR-5]"
+   - "Is 'prominent' defined with measurable visual properties? [Ambiguity, Spec §FR-4]"
+
+   Consistency:
+   - "Do navigation requirements align across all pages? [Consistency, Spec §FR-10]"
+   - "Are card component requirements consistent between landing and detail pages? [Consistency]"
+
+   Coverage:
+   - "Are requirements defined for zero-state scenarios (no episodes)? [Coverage, Edge Case]"
+   - "Are concurrent user interaction scenarios addressed? [Coverage, Gap]"
+   - "Are requirements specified for partial data loading failures? [Coverage, Exception Flow]"
+
+   Measurability:
+   - "Are visual hierarchy requirements measurable/testable? [Acceptance Criteria, Spec §FR-1]"
+   - "Can 'balanced visual weight' be objectively verified? [Measurability, Spec §FR-2]"
+
+   **Scenario Classification & Coverage** (Requirements Quality Focus):
+   - Check if requirements exist for: Primary, Alternate, Exception/Error, Recovery, Non-Functional scenarios
+   - For each scenario class, ask: "Are [scenario type] requirements complete, clear, and consistent?"
+   - If scenario class missing: "Are [scenario type] requirements intentionally excluded or missing? [Gap]"
+   - Include resilience/rollback when state mutation occurs: "Are rollback requirements defined for migration failures? [Gap]"
+
+   **Traceability Requirements**:
+   - MINIMUM: ≥80% of items MUST include at least one traceability reference
+   - Each item should reference: spec section `[Spec §X.Y]`, or use markers: `[Gap]`, `[Ambiguity]`, `[Conflict]`, `[Assumption]`
+   - If no ID system exists: "Is a requirement & acceptance criteria ID scheme established? [Traceability]"
+
+   **Surface & Resolve Issues** (Requirements Quality Problems):
+   Ask questions about the requirements themselves:
+   - Ambiguities: "Is the term 'fast' quantified with specific metrics? [Ambiguity, Spec §NFR-1]"
+   - Conflicts: "Do navigation requirements conflict between §FR-10 and §FR-10a? [Conflict]"
+   - Assumptions: "Is the assumption of 'always available podcast API' validated? [Assumption]"
+   - Dependencies: "Are external podcast API requirements documented? [Dependency, Gap]"
+   - Missing definitions: "Is 'visual hierarchy' defined with measurable criteria? [Gap]"
+
+   **Content Consolidation**:
+   - Soft cap: If raw candidate items > 40, prioritize by risk/impact
+   - Merge near-duplicates checking the same requirement aspect
+   - If >5 low-impact edge cases, create one item: "Are edge cases X, Y, Z addressed in requirements? [Coverage]"
+
+   **🚫 ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED** - These make it an implementation test, not a requirements test:
+   - ❌ Any item starting with "Verify", "Test", "Confirm", "Check" + implementation behavior
+   - ❌ References to code execution, user actions, system behavior
+   - ❌ "Displays correctly", "works properly", "functions as expected"
+   - ❌ "Click", "navigate", "render", "load", "execute"
+   - ❌ Test cases, test plans, QA procedures
+   - ❌ Implementation details (frameworks, APIs, algorithms)
+
+   **✅ REQUIRED PATTERNS** - These test requirements quality:
+   - ✅ "Are [requirement type] defined/specified/documented for [scenario]?"
+   - ✅ "Is [vague term] quantified/clarified with specific criteria?"
+   - ✅ "Are requirements consistent between [section A] and [section B]?"
+   - ✅ "Can [requirement] be objectively measured/verified?"
+   - ✅ "Are [edge cases/scenarios] addressed in requirements?"
+   - ✅ "Does the spec define [missing aspect]?"
+
+6. **Structure Reference**: Generate the checklist following the canonical template in `.specify/templates/checklist-template.md` for title, meta section, category headings, and ID formatting. If template is unavailable, use: H1 title, purpose/created meta lines, `##` category sections containing `- [ ] CHK### <requirement item>` lines with globally incrementing IDs starting at CHK001.
+
+7. **Report**: Output full path to checklist file, item count, and summarize whether the run created a new file or appended to an existing one. Summarize:
+   - Focus areas selected
+   - Depth level
+   - Actor/timing
+   - Any explicit user-specified must-have items incorporated
+
+**Important**: Each `/speckit.checklist` command invocation uses a short, descriptive checklist filename and either creates a new file or appends to an existing one. This allows:
+
+- Multiple checklists of different types (e.g., `ux.md`, `test.md`, `security.md`)
+- Simple, memorable filenames that indicate checklist purpose
+- Easy identification and navigation in the `checklists/` folder
+
+To avoid clutter, use descriptive types and clean up obsolete checklists when done.
+
+## Example Checklist Types & Sample Items
+
+**UX Requirements Quality:** `ux.md`
+
+Sample items (testing the requirements, NOT the implementation):
+
+- "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined with measurable criteria? [Clarity, Spec §FR-1]"
+- "Is the number and positioning of UI elements explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-1]"
+- "Are interaction state requirements (hover, focus, active) consistently defined? [Consistency]"
+- "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Coverage, Gap]"
+- "Is fallback behavior defined when images fail to load? [Edge Case, Gap]"
+- "Can 'prominent display' be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-4]"
+
+**API Requirements Quality:** `api.md`
+
+Sample items:
+
+- "Are error response formats specified for all failure scenarios? [Completeness]"
+- "Are rate limiting requirements quantified with specific thresholds? [Clarity]"
+- "Are authentication requirements consistent across all endpoints? [Consistency]"
+- "Are retry/timeout requirements defined for external dependencies? [Coverage, Gap]"
+- "Is versioning strategy documented in requirements? [Gap]"
+
+**Performance Requirements Quality:** `performance.md`
+
+Sample items:
+
+- "Are performance requirements quantified with specific metrics? [Clarity]"
+- "Are performance targets defined for all critical user journeys? [Coverage]"
+- "Are performance requirements under different load conditions specified? [Completeness]"
+- "Can performance requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability]"
+- "Are degradation requirements defined for high-load scenarios? [Edge Case, Gap]"
+
+**Security Requirements Quality:** `security.md`
+
+Sample items:
+
+- "Are authentication requirements specified for all protected resources? [Coverage]"
+- "Are data protection requirements defined for sensitive information? [Completeness]"
+- "Is the threat model documented and requirements aligned to it? [Traceability]"
+- "Are security requirements consistent with compliance obligations? [Consistency]"
+- "Are security failure/breach response requirements defined? [Gap, Exception Flow]"
+
+## Anti-Examples: What NOT To Do
+
+**❌ WRONG - These test implementation, not requirements:**
+
+```markdown
+- [ ] CHK001 - Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards [Spec §FR-001]
+- [ ] CHK002 - Test hover states work correctly on desktop [Spec §FR-003]
+- [ ] CHK003 - Confirm logo click navigates to home page [Spec §FR-010]
+- [ ] CHK004 - Check that related episodes section shows 3-5 items [Spec §FR-005]
+```
+
+**✅ CORRECT - These test requirements quality:**
+
+```markdown
+- [ ] CHK001 - Are the number and layout of featured episodes explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-001]
+- [ ] CHK002 - Are hover state requirements consistently defined for all interactive elements? [Consistency, Spec §FR-003]
+- [ ] CHK003 - Are navigation requirements clear for all clickable brand elements? [Clarity, Spec §FR-010]
+- [ ] CHK004 - Is the selection criteria for related episodes documented? [Gap, Spec §FR-005]
+- [ ] CHK005 - Are loading state requirements defined for asynchronous episode data? [Gap]
+- [ ] CHK006 - Can "visual hierarchy" requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-001]
+```
+
+**Key Differences:**
+
+- Wrong: Tests if the system works correctly
+- Correct: Tests if the requirements are written correctly
+- Wrong: Verification of behavior
+- Correct: Validation of requirement quality
+- Wrong: "Does it do X?"
+- Correct: "Is X clearly specified?"
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after checklist generation)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_checklist` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently

.opencode/command/speckit.clarify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+---
+description: Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Build Technical Plan
+    agent: speckit.plan
+    prompt: Create a plan for the spec. I am building with...
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before clarification)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_clarify` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+Goal: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in the active feature specification and record the clarifications directly in the spec file.
+
+Note: This clarification workflow is expected to run (and be completed) BEFORE invoking `/speckit.plan`. If the user explicitly states they are skipping clarification (e.g., exploratory spike), you may proceed, but must warn that downstream rework risk increases.
+
+Execution steps:
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --paths-only` from repo root **once** (combined `--json --paths-only` mode / `-Json -PathsOnly`). Parse minimal JSON payload fields:
+   - `FEATURE_DIR`
+   - `FEATURE_SPEC`
+   - (Optionally capture `IMPL_PLAN`, `TASKS` for future chained flows.)
+   - If JSON parsing fails, abort and instruct user to re-run `/speckit.specify` or verify feature branch environment.
+   - For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. Load the current spec file. Perform a structured ambiguity & coverage scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: Clear / Partial / Missing. Produce an internal coverage map used for prioritization (do not output raw map unless no questions will be asked).
+
+   Functional Scope & Behavior:
+   - Core user goals & success criteria
+   - Explicit out-of-scope declarations
+   - User roles / personas differentiation
+
+   Domain & Data Model:
+   - Entities, attributes, relationships
+   - Identity & uniqueness rules
+   - Lifecycle/state transitions
+   - Data volume / scale assumptions
+
+   Interaction & UX Flow:
+   - Critical user journeys / sequences
+   - Error/empty/loading states
+   - Accessibility or localization notes
+
+   Non-Functional Quality Attributes:
+   - Performance (latency, throughput targets)
+   - Scalability (horizontal/vertical, limits)
+   - Reliability & availability (uptime, recovery expectations)
+   - Observability (logging, metrics, tracing signals)
+   - Security & privacy (authN/Z, data protection, threat assumptions)
+   - Compliance / regulatory constraints (if any)
+
+   Integration & External Dependencies:
+   - External services/APIs and failure modes
+   - Data import/export formats
+   - Protocol/versioning assumptions
+
+   Edge Cases & Failure Handling:
+   - Negative scenarios
+   - Rate limiting / throttling
+   - Conflict resolution (e.g., concurrent edits)
+
+   Constraints & Tradeoffs:
+   - Technical constraints (language, storage, hosting)
+   - Explicit tradeoffs or rejected alternatives
+
+   Terminology & Consistency:
+   - Canonical glossary terms
+   - Avoided synonyms / deprecated terms
+
+   Completion Signals:
+   - Acceptance criteria testability
+   - Measurable Definition of Done style indicators
+
+   Misc / Placeholders:
+   - TODO markers / unresolved decisions
+   - Ambiguous adjectives ("robust", "intuitive") lacking quantification
+
+   For each category with Partial or Missing status, add a candidate question opportunity unless:
+   - Clarification would not materially change implementation or validation strategy
+   - Information is better deferred to planning phase (note internally)
+
+3. Generate (internally) a prioritized queue of candidate clarification questions (maximum 5). Do NOT output them all at once. Apply these constraints:
+    - Maximum of 5 total questions across the whole session.
+    - Each question must be answerable with EITHER:
+       - A short multiple‑choice selection (2–5 distinct, mutually exclusive options), OR
+       - A one-word / short‑phrase answer (explicitly constrain: "Answer in <=5 words").
+    - Only include questions whose answers materially impact architecture, data modeling, task decomposition, test design, UX behavior, operational readiness, or compliance validation.
+    - Ensure category coverage balance: attempt to cover the highest impact unresolved categories first; avoid asking two low-impact questions when a single high-impact area (e.g., security posture) is unresolved.
+    - Exclude questions already answered, trivial stylistic preferences, or plan-level execution details (unless blocking correctness).
+    - Favor clarifications that reduce downstream rework risk or prevent misaligned acceptance tests.
+    - If more than 5 categories remain unresolved, select the top 5 by (Impact * Uncertainty) heuristic.
+
+4. Sequential questioning loop (interactive):
+    - Present EXACTLY ONE question at a time.
+    - For multiple‑choice questions:
+       - **Analyze all options** and determine the **most suitable option** based on:
+          - Best practices for the project type
+          - Common patterns in similar implementations
+          - Risk reduction (security, performance, maintainability)
+          - Alignment with any explicit project goals or constraints visible in the spec
+       - Present your **recommended option prominently** at the top with clear reasoning (1-2 sentences explaining why this is the best choice).
+       - Format as: `**Recommended:** Option [X] - <reasoning>`
+       - Then render all options as a Markdown table:
+
+       | Option | Description |
+       |--------|-------------|
+       | A | <Option A description> |
+       | B | <Option B description> |
+       | C | <Option C description> (add D/E as needed up to 5) |
+       | Short | Provide a different short answer (<=5 words) (Include only if free-form alternative is appropriate) |
+
+       - After the table, add: `You can reply with the option letter (e.g., "A"), accept the recommendation by saying "yes" or "recommended", or provide your own short answer.`
+    - For short‑answer style (no meaningful discrete options):
+       - Provide your **suggested answer** based on best practices and context.
+       - Format as: `**Suggested:** <your proposed answer> - <brief reasoning>`
+       - Then output: `Format: Short answer (<=5 words). You can accept the suggestion by saying "yes" or "suggested", or provide your own answer.`
+    - After the user answers:
+       - If the user replies with "yes", "recommended", or "suggested", use your previously stated recommendation/suggestion as the answer.
+       - Otherwise, validate the answer maps to one option or fits the <=5 word constraint.
+       - If ambiguous, ask for a quick disambiguation (count still belongs to same question; do not advance).
+       - Once satisfactory, record it in working memory (do not yet write to disk) and move to the next queued question.
+    - Stop asking further questions when:
+       - All critical ambiguities resolved early (remaining queued items become unnecessary), OR
+       - User signals completion ("done", "good", "no more"), OR
+       - You reach 5 asked questions.
+    - Never reveal future queued questions in advance.
+    - If no valid questions exist at start, immediately report no critical ambiguities.
+
+5. Integration after EACH accepted answer (incremental update approach):
+    - Maintain in-memory representation of the spec (loaded once at start) plus the raw file contents.
+    - For the first integrated answer in this session:
+       - Ensure a `## Clarifications` section exists (create it just after the highest-level contextual/overview section per the spec template if missing).
+       - Under it, create (if not present) a `### Session YYYY-MM-DD` subheading for today.
+    - Append a bullet line immediately after acceptance: `- Q: <question> → A: <final answer>`.
+    - Then immediately apply the clarification to the most appropriate section(s):
+       - Functional ambiguity → Update or add a bullet in Functional Requirements.
+       - User interaction / actor distinction → Update User Stories or Actors subsection (if present) with clarified role, constraint, or scenario.
+       - Data shape / entities → Update Data Model (add fields, types, relationships) preserving ordering; note added constraints succinctly.
+       - Non-functional constraint → Add/modify measurable criteria in Success Criteria > Measurable Outcomes (convert vague adjective to metric or explicit target).
+       - Edge case / negative flow → Add a new bullet under Edge Cases / Error Handling (or create such subsection if template provides placeholder for it).
+       - Terminology conflict → Normalize term across spec; retain original only if necessary by adding `(formerly referred to as "X")` once.
+    - If the clarification invalidates an earlier ambiguous statement, replace that statement instead of duplicating; leave no obsolete contradictory text.
+    - Save the spec file AFTER each integration to minimize risk of context loss (atomic overwrite).
+    - Preserve formatting: do not reorder unrelated sections; keep heading hierarchy intact.
+    - Keep each inserted clarification minimal and testable (avoid narrative drift).
+
+6. Validation (performed after EACH write plus final pass):
+   - Clarifications session contains exactly one bullet per accepted answer (no duplicates).
+   - Total asked (accepted) questions ≤ 5.
+   - Updated sections contain no lingering vague placeholders the new answer was meant to resolve.
+   - No contradictory earlier statement remains (scan for now-invalid alternative choices removed).
+   - Markdown structure valid; only allowed new headings: `## Clarifications`, `### Session YYYY-MM-DD`.
+   - Terminology consistency: same canonical term used across all updated sections.
+
+7. Write the updated spec back to `FEATURE_SPEC`.
+
+8. Report completion (after questioning loop ends or early termination):
+   - Number of questions asked & answered.
+   - Path to updated spec.
+   - Sections touched (list names).
+   - Coverage summary table listing each taxonomy category with Status: Resolved (was Partial/Missing and addressed), Deferred (exceeds question quota or better suited for planning), Clear (already sufficient), Outstanding (still Partial/Missing but low impact).
+   - If any Outstanding or Deferred remain, recommend whether to proceed to `/speckit.plan` or run `/speckit.clarify` again later post-plan.
+   - Suggested next command.
+
+Behavior rules:
+
+- If no meaningful ambiguities found (or all potential questions would be low-impact), respond: "No critical ambiguities detected worth formal clarification." and suggest proceeding.
+- If spec file missing, instruct user to run `/speckit.specify` first (do not create a new spec here).
+- Never exceed 5 total asked questions (clarification retries for a single question do not count as new questions).
+- Avoid speculative tech stack questions unless the absence blocks functional clarity.
+- Respect user early termination signals ("stop", "done", "proceed").
+- If no questions asked due to full coverage, output a compact coverage summary (all categories Clear) then suggest advancing.
+- If quota reached with unresolved high-impact categories remaining, explicitly flag them under Deferred with rationale.
+
+Context for prioritization: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after clarification)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_clarify` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently

.opencode/command/speckit.constitution.md

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+---
+description: Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Build Specification
+    agent: speckit.specify
+    prompt: Implement the feature specification based on the updated constitution. I want to build...
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before constitution update)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_constitution` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+You are updating the project constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. This file is a TEMPLATE containing placeholder tokens in square brackets (e.g. `[PROJECT_NAME]`, `[PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]`). Your job is to (a) collect/derive concrete values, (b) fill the template precisely, and (c) propagate any amendments across dependent artifacts.
+
+**Note**: If `.specify/memory/constitution.md` does not exist yet, it should have been initialized from `.specify/templates/constitution-template.md` during project setup. If it's missing, copy the template first.
+
+Follow this execution flow:
+
+1. Load the existing constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`.
+   - Identify every placeholder token of the form `[ALL_CAPS_IDENTIFIER]`.
+   **IMPORTANT**: The user might require less or more principles than the ones used in the template. If a number is specified, respect that - follow the general template. You will update the doc accordingly.
+
+2. Collect/derive values for placeholders:
+   - If user input (conversation) supplies a value, use it.
+   - Otherwise infer from existing repo context (README, docs, prior constitution versions if embedded).
+   - For governance dates: `RATIFICATION_DATE` is the original adoption date (if unknown ask or mark TODO), `LAST_AMENDED_DATE` is today if changes are made, otherwise keep previous.
+   - `CONSTITUTION_VERSION` must increment according to semantic versioning rules:
+     - MAJOR: Backward incompatible governance/principle removals or redefinitions.
+     - MINOR: New principle/section added or materially expanded guidance.
+     - PATCH: Clarifications, wording, typo fixes, non-semantic refinements.
+   - If version bump type ambiguous, propose reasoning before finalizing.
+
+3. Draft the updated constitution content:
+   - Replace every placeholder with concrete text (no bracketed tokens left except intentionally retained template slots that the project has chosen not to define yet—explicitly justify any left).
+   - Preserve heading hierarchy and comments can be removed once replaced unless they still add clarifying guidance.
+   - Ensure each Principle section: succinct name line, paragraph (or bullet list) capturing non‑negotiable rules, explicit rationale if not obvious.
+   - Ensure Governance section lists amendment procedure, versioning policy, and compliance review expectations.
+
+4. Consistency propagation checklist (convert prior checklist into active validations):
+   - Read `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` and ensure any "Constitution Check" or rules align with updated principles.
+   - Read `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` for scope/requirements alignment—update if constitution adds/removes mandatory sections or constraints.
+   - Read `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` and ensure task categorization reflects new or removed principle-driven task types (e.g., observability, versioning, testing discipline).
+   - Read each command file in `.specify/templates/commands/*.md` (including this one) to verify no outdated references (agent-specific names like CLAUDE only) remain when generic guidance is required.
+   - Read any runtime guidance docs (e.g., `README.md`, `docs/quickstart.md`, or agent-specific guidance files if present). Update references to principles changed.
+
+5. Produce a Sync Impact Report (prepend as an HTML comment at top of the constitution file after update):
+   - Version change: old → new
+   - List of modified principles (old title → new title if renamed)
+   - Added sections
+   - Removed sections
+   - Templates requiring updates (✅ updated / ⚠ pending) with file paths
+   - Follow-up TODOs if any placeholders intentionally deferred.
+
+6. Validation before final output:
+   - No remaining unexplained bracket tokens.
+   - Version line matches report.
+   - Dates ISO format YYYY-MM-DD.
+   - Principles are declarative, testable, and free of vague language ("should" → replace with MUST/SHOULD rationale where appropriate).
+
+7. Write the completed constitution back to `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (overwrite).
+
+8. Output a final summary to the user with:
+   - New version and bump rationale.
+   - Any files flagged for manual follow-up.
+   - Suggested commit message (e.g., `docs: amend constitution to vX.Y.Z (principle additions + governance update)`).
+
+Formatting & Style Requirements:
+
+- Use Markdown headings exactly as in the template (do not demote/promote levels).
+- Wrap long rationale lines to keep readability (<100 chars ideally) but do not hard enforce with awkward breaks.
+- Keep a single blank line between sections.
+- Avoid trailing whitespace.
+
+If the user supplies partial updates (e.g., only one principle revision), still perform validation and version decision steps.
+
+If critical info missing (e.g., ratification date truly unknown), insert `TODO(<FIELD_NAME>): explanation` and include in the Sync Impact Report under deferred items.
+
+Do not create a new template; always operate on the existing `.specify/memory/constitution.md` file.
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after constitution update)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_constitution` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently

.opencode/command/speckit.implement.md

@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+---
+description: Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before implementation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_implement` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Check checklists status** (if FEATURE_DIR/checklists/ exists):
+   - Scan all checklist files in the checklists/ directory
+   - For each checklist, count:
+     - Total items: All lines matching `- [ ]` or `- [X]` or `- [x]`
+     - Completed items: Lines matching `- [X]` or `- [x]`
+     - Incomplete items: Lines matching `- [ ]`
+   - Create a status table:
+
+     ```text
+     | Checklist | Total | Completed | Incomplete | Status |
+     |-----------|-------|-----------|------------|--------|
+     | ux.md     | 12    | 12        | 0          | ✓ PASS |
+     | test.md   | 8     | 5         | 3          | ✗ FAIL |
+     | security.md | 6   | 6         | 0          | ✓ PASS |
+     ```
+
+   - Calculate overall status:
+     - **PASS**: All checklists have 0 incomplete items
+     - **FAIL**: One or more checklists have incomplete items
+
+   - **If any checklist is incomplete**:
+     - Display the table with incomplete item counts
+     - **STOP** and ask: "Some checklists are incomplete. Do you want to proceed with implementation anyway? (yes/no)"
+     - Wait for user response before continuing
+     - If user says "no" or "wait" or "stop", halt execution
+     - If user says "yes" or "proceed" or "continue", proceed to step 3
+
+   - **If all checklists are complete**:
+     - Display the table showing all checklists passed
+     - Automatically proceed to step 3
+
+3. Load and analyze the implementation context:
+   - **REQUIRED**: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
+   - **REQUIRED**: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read .specify/memory/constitution.md for governance constraints
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
+
+4. **Project Setup Verification**:
+   - **REQUIRED**: Create/verify ignore files based on actual project setup:
+
+   **Detection & Creation Logic**:
+   - Check if the following command succeeds to determine if the repository is a git repo (create/verify .gitignore if so):
+
+     ```sh
+     git rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null
+     ```
+
+   - Check if Dockerfile* exists or Docker in plan.md → create/verify .dockerignore
+   - Check if .eslintrc* exists → create/verify .eslintignore
+   - Check if eslint.config.* exists → ensure the config's `ignores` entries cover required patterns
+   - Check if .prettierrc* exists → create/verify .prettierignore
+   - Check if .npmrc or package.json exists → create/verify .npmignore (if publishing)
+   - Check if terraform files (*.tf) exist → create/verify .terraformignore
+   - Check if .helmignore needed (helm charts present) → create/verify .helmignore
+
+   **If ignore file already exists**: Verify it contains essential patterns, append missing critical patterns only
+   **If ignore file missing**: Create with full pattern set for detected technology
+
+   **Common Patterns by Technology** (from plan.md tech stack):
+   - **Node.js/JavaScript/TypeScript**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **Python**: `__pycache__/`, `*.pyc`, `.venv/`, `venv/`, `dist/`, `*.egg-info/`
+   - **Java**: `target/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `.gradle/`, `build/`
+   - **C#/.NET**: `bin/`, `obj/`, `*.user`, `*.suo`, `packages/`
+   - **Go**: `*.exe`, `*.test`, `vendor/`, `*.out`
+   - **Ruby**: `.bundle/`, `log/`, `tmp/`, `*.gem`, `vendor/bundle/`
+   - **PHP**: `vendor/`, `*.log`, `*.cache`, `*.env`
+   - **Rust**: `target/`, `debug/`, `release/`, `*.rs.bk`, `*.rlib`, `*.prof*`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **Kotlin**: `build/`, `out/`, `.gradle/`, `.idea/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `*.iml`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **C++**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.so`, `*.a`, `*.exe`, `*.dll`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **C**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.a`, `*.so`, `*.exe`, `*.dll`, `autom4te.cache/`, `config.status`, `config.log`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **Swift**: `.build/`, `DerivedData/`, `*.swiftpm/`, `Packages/`
+   - **R**: `.Rproj.user/`, `.Rhistory`, `.RData`, `.Ruserdata`, `*.Rproj`, `packrat/`, `renv/`
+   - **Universal**: `.DS_Store`, `Thumbs.db`, `*.tmp`, `*.swp`, `.vscode/`, `.idea/`
+
+   **Tool-Specific Patterns**:
+   - **Docker**: `node_modules/`, `.git/`, `Dockerfile*`, `.dockerignore`, `*.log*`, `.env*`, `coverage/`
+   - **ESLint**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `*.min.js`
+   - **Prettier**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `package-lock.json`, `yarn.lock`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`
+   - **Terraform**: `.terraform/`, `*.tfstate*`, `*.tfvars`, `.terraform.lock.hcl`
+   - **Kubernetes/k8s**: `*.secret.yaml`, `secrets/`, `.kube/`, `kubeconfig*`, `*.key`, `*.crt`
+
+5. Parse tasks.md structure and extract:
+   - **Task phases**: Setup, Tests, Core, Integration, Polish
+   - **Task dependencies**: Sequential vs parallel execution rules
+   - **Task details**: ID, description, file paths, parallel markers [P]
+   - **Execution flow**: Order and dependency requirements
+
+6. Execute implementation following the task plan:
+   - **Phase-by-phase execution**: Complete each phase before moving to the next
+   - **Respect dependencies**: Run sequential tasks in order, parallel tasks [P] can run together  
+   - **Follow TDD approach**: Execute test tasks before their corresponding implementation tasks
+   - **File-based coordination**: Tasks affecting the same files must run sequentially
+   - **Validation checkpoints**: Verify each phase completion before proceeding
+
+7. Implementation execution rules:
+   - **Setup first**: Initialize project structure, dependencies, configuration
+   - **Tests before code**: If you need to write tests for contracts, entities, and integration scenarios
+   - **Core development**: Implement models, services, CLI commands, endpoints
+   - **Integration work**: Database connections, middleware, logging, external services
+   - **Polish and validation**: Unit tests, performance optimization, documentation
+
+8. Progress tracking and error handling:
+   - Report progress after each completed task
+   - Halt execution if any non-parallel task fails
+   - For parallel tasks [P], continue with successful tasks, report failed ones
+   - Provide clear error messages with context for debugging
+   - Suggest next steps if implementation cannot proceed
+   - **IMPORTANT** For completed tasks, make sure to mark the task off as [X] in the tasks file.
+
+9. Completion validation:
+   - Verify all required tasks are completed
+   - Check that implemented features match the original specification
+   - Validate that tests pass and coverage meets requirements
+   - Confirm the implementation follows the technical plan
+   - Report final status with summary of completed work
+
+Note: This command assumes a complete task breakdown exists in tasks.md. If tasks are incomplete or missing, suggest running `/speckit.tasks` first to regenerate the task list.
+
+10. **Check for extension hooks**: After completion validation, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+    - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_implement` key
+    - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+    - Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+    - For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+      - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+      - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+    - For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+      - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+        ```
+        ## Extension Hooks
+
+        **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+        Command: `/{command}`
+        Description: {description}
+
+        Prompt: {prompt}
+        To execute: `/{command}`
+        ```
+      - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+        ```
+        ## Extension Hooks
+
+        **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+        Executing: `/{command}`
+        EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+        ```
+    - If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently

.opencode/command/speckit.plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+---
+description: Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Create Tasks
+    agent: speckit.tasks
+    prompt: Break the plan into tasks
+    send: true
+  - label: Create Checklist
+    agent: speckit.checklist
+    prompt: Create a checklist for the following domain...
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before planning)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_plan` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Load context**: Read FEATURE_SPEC and `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied).
+
+3. **Execute plan workflow**: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
+   - Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
+   - Fill Constitution Check section from constitution
+   - Evaluate gates (ERROR if violations unjustified)
+   - Phase 0: Generate research.md (resolve all NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
+   - Phase 1: Generate data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
+   - Phase 1: Update agent context by running the agent script
+   - Re-evaluate Constitution Check post-design
+
+4. **Stop and report**: Command ends after Phase 2 planning. Report branch, IMPL_PLAN path, and generated artifacts.
+
+5. **Check for extension hooks**: After reporting, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+   - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_plan` key
+   - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+   - Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+   - For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+     - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+     - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+   - For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+     - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+       Command: `/{command}`
+       Description: {description}
+
+       Prompt: {prompt}
+       To execute: `/{command}`
+       ```
+     - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+       Executing: `/{command}`
+       EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+       ```
+   - If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Phases
+
+### Phase 0: Outline & Research
+
+1. **Extract unknowns from Technical Context** above:
+   - For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
+   - For each dependency → best practices task
+   - For each integration → patterns task
+
+2. **Generate and dispatch research agents**:
+
+   ```text
+   For each unknown in Technical Context:
+     Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}"
+   For each technology choice:
+     Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"
+   ```
+
+3. **Consolidate findings** in `research.md` using format:
+   - Decision: [what was chosen]
+   - Rationale: [why chosen]
+   - Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
+
+**Output**: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
+
+### Phase 1: Design & Contracts
+
+**Prerequisites:** `research.md` complete
+
+1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
+   - Entity name, fields, relationships
+   - Validation rules from requirements
+   - State transitions if applicable
+
+2. **Define interface contracts** (if project has external interfaces) → `/contracts/`:
+   - Identify what interfaces the project exposes to users or other systems
+   - Document the contract format appropriate for the project type
+   - Examples: public APIs for libraries, command schemas for CLI tools, endpoints for web services, grammars for parsers, UI contracts for applications
+   - Skip if project is purely internal (build scripts, one-off tools, etc.)
+
+3. **Agent context update**:
+   - Update the plan reference between the `<!-- SPECKIT START -->` and `<!-- SPECKIT END -->` markers in `AGENTS.md` to point to the plan file created in step 1 (the IMPL_PLAN path)
+
+**Output**: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md, updated agent context file
+
+## Key rules
+
+- Use absolute paths for filesystem operations; use project-relative paths for references in documentation and agent context files
+- ERROR on gate failures or unresolved clarifications

.opencode/command/speckit.specify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,327 @@
+---
+description: Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Build Technical Plan
+    agent: speckit.plan
+    prompt: Create a plan for the spec. I am building with...
+  - label: Clarify Spec Requirements
+    agent: speckit.clarify
+    prompt: Clarify specification requirements
+    send: true
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before specification)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_specify` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+The text the user typed after `/speckit.specify` in the triggering message **is** the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if `$ARGUMENTS` appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
+
+Given that feature description, do this:
+
+1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the feature:
+   - Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
+   - Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
+   - Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
+   - Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
+   - Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
+   - Examples:
+     - "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
+     - "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
+     - "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
+     - "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
+
+2. **Branch creation** (optional, via hook):
+
+   If a `before_specify` hook ran successfully in the Pre-Execution Checks above, it will have created/switched to a git branch and output JSON containing `BRANCH_NAME` and `FEATURE_NUM`. Note these values for reference, but the branch name does **not** dictate the spec directory name.
+
+   If the user explicitly provided `GIT_BRANCH_NAME`, pass it through to the hook so the branch script uses the exact value as the branch name (bypassing all prefix/suffix generation).
+
+3. **Create the spec feature directory**:
+
+   Specs live under the default `specs/` directory unless the user explicitly provides `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`.
+
+   **Resolution order for `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`**:
+   1. If the user explicitly provided `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` (e.g., via environment variable, argument, or configuration), use it as-is
+   2. Otherwise, auto-generate it under `specs/`:
+      - Check `.specify/init-options.json` for `branch_numbering`
+      - If `"timestamp"`: prefix is `YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS` (current timestamp)
+      - If `"sequential"` or absent: prefix is `NNN` (next available 3-digit number after scanning existing directories in `specs/`)
+      - Construct the directory name: `<prefix>-<short-name>` (e.g., `003-user-auth` or `20260319-143022-user-auth`)
+      - Set `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` to `specs/<directory-name>`
+
+   **Create the directory and spec file**:
+   - `mkdir -p SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`
+   - Copy `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md` as the starting point
+   - Set `SPEC_FILE` to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md`
+   - Persist the resolved path to `.specify/feature.json`:
+     ```json
+     {
+       "feature_directory": "<resolved feature dir>"
+     }
+     ```
+     Write the actual resolved directory path value (for example, `specs/003-user-auth`), not the literal string `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`.
+     This allows downstream commands (`/speckit.plan`, `/speckit.tasks`, etc.) to locate the feature directory without relying on git branch name conventions.
+
+   **IMPORTANT**:
+   - You must only create one feature per `/speckit.specify` invocation
+   - The spec directory name and the git branch name are independent — they may be the same but that is the user's choice
+   - The spec directory and file are always created by this command, never by the hook
+
+4. Load `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to understand required sections.
+
+5. Follow this execution flow:
+    1. Parse user description from arguments
+       If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
+    2. Extract key concepts from description
+       Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
+    3. For unclear aspects:
+       - Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
+       - Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
+         - The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
+         - Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
+         - No reasonable default exists
+       - **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
+       - Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+    4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
+       If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
+    5. Generate Functional Requirements
+       Each requirement must be testable
+       Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
+    6. Define Success Criteria
+       Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
+       Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
+       Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
+    7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
+    8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
+
+6. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
+
+7. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
+
+   a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
+
+      ```markdown
+      # Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
+      
+      **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
+      **Created**: [DATE]
+      **Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
+      
+      ## Content Quality
+      
+      - [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
+      - [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
+      - [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
+      - [ ] All mandatory sections completed
+      
+      ## Requirement Completeness
+      
+      - [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
+      - [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
+      - [ ] Success criteria are measurable
+      - [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
+      - [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
+      - [ ] Edge cases are identified
+      - [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
+      - [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
+      
+      ## Feature Readiness
+      
+      - [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
+      - [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
+      - [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
+      - [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
+      
+      ## Notes
+      
+      - Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
+      ```
+
+   b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
+      - For each item, determine if it passes or fails
+      - Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
+
+   c. **Handle Validation Results**:
+
+      - **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to step 8
+
+      - **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
+        1. List the failing items and specific issues
+        2. Update the spec to address each issue
+        3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
+        4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
+
+      - **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
+        1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
+        2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
+        3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
+
+           ```markdown
+           ## Question [N]: [Topic]
+           
+           **Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
+           
+           **What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
+           
+           **Suggested Answers**:
+           
+           | Option | Answer | Implications |
+           |--------|--------|--------------|
+           | A      | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | B      | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | C      | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
+           
+           **Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
+           ```
+
+        4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
+           - Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
+           - Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
+           - Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
+           - Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
+        5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
+        6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
+        7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
+        8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
+        9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
+
+   d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
+
+8. **Report completion** to the user with:
+   - `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` — the feature directory path
+   - `SPEC_FILE` — the spec file path
+   - Checklist results summary
+   - Readiness for the next phase (`/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`)
+
+9. **Check for extension hooks**: After reporting completion, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+   - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_specify` key
+   - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+   - Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+   - For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+     - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+     - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+   - For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+     - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+       Command: `/{command}`
+       Description: {description}
+
+       Prompt: {prompt}
+       To execute: `/{command}`
+       ```
+     - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+       Executing: `/{command}`
+       EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+       ```
+   - If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+**NOTE:** Branch creation is handled by the `before_specify` hook (git extension). Spec directory and file creation are always handled by this core command.
+
+## Quick Guidelines
+
+- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
+- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
+- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
+- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
+
+### Section Requirements
+
+- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
+- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
+- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
+
+### For AI Generation
+
+When creating this spec from a user prompt:
+
+1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
+2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
+3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
+   - Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
+   - Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
+   - Lack any reasonable default
+4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
+6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
+   - Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
+   - User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
+   - Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
+
+**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
+
+- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
+- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
+- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
+- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
+- Integration patterns: Use project-appropriate patterns (REST/GraphQL for web services, function calls for libraries, CLI args for tools, etc.)
+
+### Success Criteria Guidelines
+
+Success criteria must be:
+
+1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
+2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
+3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
+4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
+
+**Good examples**:
+
+- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
+- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
+- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
+- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
+
+**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
+
+- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
+- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
+- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
+- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)

.opencode/command/speckit.tasks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+---
+description: Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Analyze For Consistency
+    agent: speckit.analyze
+    prompt: Run a project analysis for consistency
+    send: true
+  - label: Implement Project
+    agent: speckit.implement
+    prompt: Start the implementation in phases
+    send: true
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before tasks generation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_tasks` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/setup-tasks.sh --json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR, TASKS_TEMPLATE, and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. `FEATURE_DIR` and `TASKS_TEMPLATE` must be absolute paths when provided. `AVAILABLE_DOCS` is a list of document names/relative paths available under `FEATURE_DIR` (for example `research.md` or `contracts/`). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Load design documents**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
+   - **Required**: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
+   - **Optional**: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (interface contracts), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
+   - Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
+
+3. **Execute task generation workflow**:
+   - Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
+   - Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
+   - If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
+   - If contracts/ exists: Map interface contracts to user stories
+   - If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
+   - Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
+   - Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
+   - Create parallel execution examples per user story
+   - Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
+
+4. **Generate tasks.md**: Read the tasks template from TASKS_TEMPLATE (from the JSON output above) and use it as structure. If TASKS_TEMPLATE is empty, fall back to `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md`. Fill with:
+   - Correct feature name from plan.md
+   - Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
+   - Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
+   - Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
+   - Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
+   - Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
+   - All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
+   - Clear file paths for each task
+   - Dependencies section showing story completion order
+   - Parallel execution examples per story
+   - Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
+
+5. **Report**: Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
+   - Total task count
+   - Task count per user story
+   - Parallel opportunities identified
+   - Independent test criteria for each story
+   - Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
+   - Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
+
+6. **Check for extension hooks**: After tasks.md is generated, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+   - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_tasks` key
+   - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+   - Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+   - For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+     - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+     - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+   - For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+     - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+       Command: `/{command}`
+       Description: {description}
+
+       Prompt: {prompt}
+       To execute: `/{command}`
+       ```
+     - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+       ```
+       ## Extension Hooks
+
+       **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+       Executing: `/{command}`
+       EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+       ```
+   - If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+Context for task generation: $ARGUMENTS
+
+The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
+
+## Task Generation Rules
+
+**CRITICAL**: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
+
+**Tests are OPTIONAL**: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
+
+### Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
+
+Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
+
+```text
+- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
+```
+
+**Format Components**:
+
+1. **Checkbox**: ALWAYS start with `- [ ]` (markdown checkbox)
+2. **Task ID**: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
+3. **[P] marker**: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
+4. **[Story] label**: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
+   - Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
+   - Setup phase: NO story label
+   - Foundational phase: NO story label  
+   - User Story phases: MUST have story label
+   - Polish phase: NO story label
+5. **Description**: Clear action with exact file path
+
+**Examples**:
+
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py`
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] Create User model` (missing ID and Story label)
+- ❌ WRONG: `T001 [US1] Create model` (missing checkbox)
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] [US1] Create User model` (missing Task ID)
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model` (missing file path)
+
+### Task Organization
+
+1. **From User Stories (spec.md)** - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
+   - Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
+   - Map all related components to their story:
+     - Models needed for that story
+     - Services needed for that story
+     - Interfaces/UI needed for that story
+     - If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
+   - Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
+
+2. **From Contracts**:
+   - Map each interface contract → to the user story it serves
+   - If tests requested: Each interface contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
+
+3. **From Data Model**:
+   - Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
+   - If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
+   - Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
+
+4. **From Setup/Infrastructure**:
+   - Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
+   - Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
+   - Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
+
+### Phase Structure
+
+- **Phase 1**: Setup (project initialization)
+- **Phase 2**: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
+- **Phase 3+**: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
+  - Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
+  - Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
+- **Final Phase**: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns

.opencode/command/speckit.taskstoissues.md

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+---
+description: Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts.
+tools: ['github/github-mcp-server/issue_write']
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before tasks-to-issues conversion)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_taskstoissues` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+1. From the executed script, extract the path to **tasks**.
+1. Get the Git remote by running:
+
+```bash
+git config --get remote.origin.url
+```
+
+> [!CAUTION]
+> ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
+
+1. For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote.
+
+> [!CAUTION]
+> UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after tasks-to-issues conversion)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_taskstoissues` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently

.specify/integration.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "version": "0.8.8",
+  "integration_state_schema": 1,
+  "installed_integrations": [
+    "opencode"
+  ],
+  "integration_settings": {
+    "opencode": {
+      "script": "sh",
+      "invoke_separator": "."
+    }
+  },
+  "integration": "opencode",
+  "default_integration": "opencode"
+}

.specify/integrations/opencode.manifest.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "integration": "opencode",
+  "version": "0.8.8",
+  "installed_at": "2026-05-11T22:30:52.405689+00:00",
+  "files": {
+    ".opencode/command/speckit.analyze.md": "699032fdd49afe31d23c7191f3fe7bcb1d14b081fbc94c2287e6ba3a57574fda",
+    ".opencode/command/speckit.checklist.md": "d7d691689fe45427c868dcf18ade4df500f0c742a6c91923fefba405d6466dde",
+    ".opencode/command/speckit.clarify.md": "0cc766dcc5cab233ccdf3bc4cfb5759a6d7d1e13e29f611083046f818f5812bb",
+    ".opencode/command/speckit.constitution.md": "58d35eb026f56bb7364d91b8b0382d5dd1249ded6c1449a2b69546693afb85f7",
+    ".opencode/command/speckit.implement.md": "2acb475f761e5b65319c4e71847bd07b88c933b45da7be45e7801271f64fcd4d",
+    ".opencode/command/speckit.plan.md": "5b1e9c9b5a26a1877fe3b655a9350562cf5ee88788f9030e6b8a9dc1de88b347",
+    ".opencode/command/speckit.specify.md": "c7b1ab7ceafc42607e86dd6c0dab0b5cb74462a93a3cdd3b5e7173468cc88bdf",
+    ".opencode/command/speckit.tasks.md": "6b42e295fb67082392b4b62febf297c73655ea67cc9379cd5df80468e920cb4c",
+    ".opencode/command/speckit.taskstoissues.md": "e84794f7a839126defb364ca815352c5c2b2d20db2d6da399fa53e4ddbb7b3ee"
+  }
+}

.specify/integrations/speckit.manifest.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "integration": "speckit",
+  "version": "0.8.8",
+  "installed_at": "2026-05-11T22:30:52.423261+00:00",
+  "files": {
+    ".specify/scripts/bash/common.sh": "dd638316259e699fd466542c77ef16af5eb198efe0447c081f86b890db414ba8",
+    ".specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh": "0d1d7a66de157b0be1385bb91aa71e5bf95550217abf47a73270dab0dc52895a",
+    ".specify/scripts/bash/setup-tasks.sh": "e8d050c63c5afb664a8b671b0b0155513fb9cab0567b335e16b9eb035482aad2",
+    ".specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh": "aff361639c504b95a2901493f5022788adc01a6792fd37f132de8f57782e4b80",
+    ".specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh": "bcf4964ca0c6c78717bb42d9e66b8c7e5ee82779cd96afc5aa7b08b75abe5790",
+    ".specify/templates/constitution-template.md": "ce7549540fa45543cca797a150201d868e64495fdff39dc38246fb17bd4024b3",
+    ".specify/templates/checklist-template.md": "312eee8291dfa984b21f95ddd0ca778e7a1f0b3a64bfc470d79762a3e3f5d7b8",
+    ".specify/templates/tasks-template.md": "5da92ac1fbf5be2f9018a5064497995bf3592761ccb6b3951503c63d851297e8",
+    ".specify/templates/spec-template.md": "785dc50d856dd92d6515eca0761e16dce0c9ba0a3cd07154fd33eae77932422a",
+    ".specify/templates/plan-template.md": "873e84b226fe3d24afe28046931b20db9bbb9210366428dc958a515349ed6e68"
+  }
+}

.specify/memory/constitution.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# [PROJECT_NAME] Constitution
+<!-- Example: Spec Constitution, TaskFlow Constitution, etc. -->
+
+## Core Principles
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]
+<!-- Example: I. Library-First -->
+[PRINCIPLE_1_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Every feature starts as a standalone library; Libraries must be self-contained, independently testable, documented; Clear purpose required - no organizational-only libraries -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_2_NAME]
+<!-- Example: II. CLI Interface -->
+[PRINCIPLE_2_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Every library exposes functionality via CLI; Text in/out protocol: stdin/args → stdout, errors → stderr; Support JSON + human-readable formats -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_3_NAME]
+<!-- Example: III. Test-First (NON-NEGOTIABLE) -->
+[PRINCIPLE_3_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: TDD mandatory: Tests written → User approved → Tests fail → Then implement; Red-Green-Refactor cycle strictly enforced -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_4_NAME]
+<!-- Example: IV. Integration Testing -->
+[PRINCIPLE_4_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Focus areas requiring integration tests: New library contract tests, Contract changes, Inter-service communication, Shared schemas -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_5_NAME]
+<!-- Example: V. Observability, VI. Versioning & Breaking Changes, VII. Simplicity -->
+[PRINCIPLE_5_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Text I/O ensures debuggability; Structured logging required; Or: MAJOR.MINOR.BUILD format; Or: Start simple, YAGNI principles -->
+
+## [SECTION_2_NAME]
+<!-- Example: Additional Constraints, Security Requirements, Performance Standards, etc. -->
+
+[SECTION_2_CONTENT]
+<!-- Example: Technology stack requirements, compliance standards, deployment policies, etc. -->
+
+## [SECTION_3_NAME]
+<!-- Example: Development Workflow, Review Process, Quality Gates, etc. -->
+
+[SECTION_3_CONTENT]
+<!-- Example: Code review requirements, testing gates, deployment approval process, etc. -->
+
+## Governance
+<!-- Example: Constitution supersedes all other practices; Amendments require documentation, approval, migration plan -->
+
+[GOVERNANCE_RULES]
+<!-- Example: All PRs/reviews must verify compliance; Complexity must be justified; Use [GUIDANCE_FILE] for runtime development guidance -->
+
+**Version**: [CONSTITUTION_VERSION] | **Ratified**: [RATIFICATION_DATE] | **Last Amended**: [LAST_AMENDED_DATE]
+<!-- Example: Version: 2.1.1 | Ratified: 2025-06-13 | Last Amended: 2025-07-16 -->

.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+# Consolidated prerequisite checking script
+#
+# This script provides unified prerequisite checking for Spec-Driven Development workflow.
+# It replaces the functionality previously spread across multiple scripts.
+#
+# Usage: ./check-prerequisites.sh [OPTIONS]
+#
+# OPTIONS:
+#   --json              Output in JSON format
+#   --require-tasks     Require tasks.md to exist (for implementation phase)
+#   --include-tasks     Include tasks.md in AVAILABLE_DOCS list
+#   --paths-only        Only output path variables (no validation)
+#   --help, -h          Show help message
+#
+# OUTPUTS:
+#   JSON mode: {"FEATURE_DIR":"...", "AVAILABLE_DOCS":["..."]}
+#   Text mode: FEATURE_DIR:... \n AVAILABLE_DOCS: \n ✓/✗ file.md
+#   Paths only: REPO_ROOT: ... \n BRANCH: ... \n FEATURE_DIR: ... etc.
+
+set -e
+
+# Parse command line arguments
+JSON_MODE=false
+REQUIRE_TASKS=false
+INCLUDE_TASKS=false
+PATHS_ONLY=false
+
+for arg in "$@"; do
+    case "$arg" in
+        --json)
+            JSON_MODE=true
+            ;;
+        --require-tasks)
+            REQUIRE_TASKS=true
+            ;;
+        --include-tasks)
+            INCLUDE_TASKS=true
+            ;;
+        --paths-only)
+            PATHS_ONLY=true
+            ;;
+        --help|-h)
+            cat << 'EOF'
+Usage: check-prerequisites.sh [OPTIONS]
+
+Consolidated prerequisite checking for Spec-Driven Development workflow.
+
+OPTIONS:
+  --json              Output in JSON format
+  --require-tasks     Require tasks.md to exist (for implementation phase)
+  --include-tasks     Include tasks.md in AVAILABLE_DOCS list
+  --paths-only        Only output path variables (no prerequisite validation)
+  --help, -h          Show this help message
+
+EXAMPLES:
+  # Check task prerequisites (plan.md required)
+  ./check-prerequisites.sh --json
+  
+  # Check implementation prerequisites (plan.md + tasks.md required)
+  ./check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks
+  
+  # Get feature paths only (no validation)
+  ./check-prerequisites.sh --paths-only
+  
+EOF
+            exit 0
+            ;;
+        *)
+            echo "ERROR: Unknown option '$arg'. Use --help for usage information." >&2
+            exit 1
+            ;;
+    esac
+done
+
+# Source common functions
+SCRIPT_DIR="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
+
+# Get feature paths and validate branch
+_paths_output=$(get_feature_paths) || { echo "ERROR: Failed to resolve feature paths" >&2; exit 1; }
+eval "$_paths_output"
+unset _paths_output
+check_feature_branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" "$HAS_GIT" || exit 1
+
+# If paths-only mode, output paths and exit (support JSON + paths-only combined)
+if $PATHS_ONLY; then
+    if $JSON_MODE; then
+        # Minimal JSON paths payload (no validation performed)
+        if has_jq; then
+            jq -cn \
+                --arg repo_root "$REPO_ROOT" \
+                --arg branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" \
+                --arg feature_dir "$FEATURE_DIR" \
+                --arg feature_spec "$FEATURE_SPEC" \
+                --arg impl_plan "$IMPL_PLAN" \
+                --arg tasks "$TASKS" \
+                '{REPO_ROOT:$repo_root,BRANCH:$branch,FEATURE_DIR:$feature_dir,FEATURE_SPEC:$feature_spec,IMPL_PLAN:$impl_plan,TASKS:$tasks}'
+        else
+            printf '{"REPO_ROOT":"%s","BRANCH":"%s","FEATURE_DIR":"%s","FEATURE_SPEC":"%s","IMPL_PLAN":"%s","TASKS":"%s"}\n' \
+                "$(json_escape "$REPO_ROOT")" "$(json_escape "$CURRENT_BRANCH")" "$(json_escape "$FEATURE_DIR")" "$(json_escape "$FEATURE_SPEC")" "$(json_escape "$IMPL_PLAN")" "$(json_escape "$TASKS")"
+        fi
+    else
+        echo "REPO_ROOT: $REPO_ROOT"
+        echo "BRANCH: $CURRENT_BRANCH"
+        echo "FEATURE_DIR: $FEATURE_DIR"
+        echo "FEATURE_SPEC: $FEATURE_SPEC"
+        echo "IMPL_PLAN: $IMPL_PLAN"
+        echo "TASKS: $TASKS"
+    fi
+    exit 0
+fi
+
+# Validate required directories and files
+if [[ ! -d "$FEATURE_DIR" ]]; then
+    echo "ERROR: Feature directory not found: $FEATURE_DIR" >&2
+    echo "Run /speckit.specify first to create the feature structure." >&2
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+if [[ ! -f "$IMPL_PLAN" ]]; then
+    echo "ERROR: plan.md not found in $FEATURE_DIR" >&2
+    echo "Run /speckit.plan first to create the implementation plan." >&2
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# Check for tasks.md if required
+if $REQUIRE_TASKS && [[ ! -f "$TASKS" ]]; then
+    echo "ERROR: tasks.md not found in $FEATURE_DIR" >&2
+    echo "Run /speckit.tasks first to create the task list." >&2
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# Build list of available documents
+docs=()
+
+# Always check these optional docs
+[[ -f "$RESEARCH" ]] && docs+=("research.md")
+[[ -f "$DATA_MODEL" ]] && docs+=("data-model.md")
+
+# Check contracts directory (only if it exists and has files)
+if [[ -d "$CONTRACTS_DIR" ]] && [[ -n "$(ls -A "$CONTRACTS_DIR" 2>/dev/null)" ]]; then
+    docs+=("contracts/")
+fi
+
+[[ -f "$QUICKSTART" ]] && docs+=("quickstart.md")
+
+# Include tasks.md if requested and it exists
+if $INCLUDE_TASKS && [[ -f "$TASKS" ]]; then
+    docs+=("tasks.md")
+fi
+
+# Output results
+if $JSON_MODE; then
+    # Build JSON array of documents
+    if has_jq; then
+        if [[ ${#docs[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
+            json_docs="[]"
+        else
+            json_docs=$(printf '%s\n' "${docs[@]}" | jq -R . | jq -s .)
+        fi
+        jq -cn \
+            --arg feature_dir "$FEATURE_DIR" \
+            --argjson docs "$json_docs" \
+            '{FEATURE_DIR:$feature_dir,AVAILABLE_DOCS:$docs}'
+    else
+        if [[ ${#docs[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
+            json_docs="[]"
+        else
+            json_docs=$(for d in "${docs[@]}"; do printf '"%s",' "$(json_escape "$d")"; done)
+            json_docs="[${json_docs%,}]"
+        fi
+        printf '{"FEATURE_DIR":"%s","AVAILABLE_DOCS":%s}\n' "$(json_escape "$FEATURE_DIR")" "$json_docs"
+    fi
+else
+    # Text output
+    echo "FEATURE_DIR:$FEATURE_DIR"
+    echo "AVAILABLE_DOCS:"
+    
+    # Show status of each potential document
+    check_file "$RESEARCH" "research.md"
+    check_file "$DATA_MODEL" "data-model.md"
+    check_dir "$CONTRACTS_DIR" "contracts/"
+    check_file "$QUICKSTART" "quickstart.md"
+    
+    if $INCLUDE_TASKS; then
+        check_file "$TASKS" "tasks.md"
+    fi
+fi

.specify/scripts/bash/common.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# Common functions and variables for all scripts
+
+# Find repository root by searching upward for .specify directory
+# This is the primary marker for spec-kit projects
+find_specify_root() {
+    local dir="${1:-$(pwd)}"
+    # Normalize to absolute path to prevent infinite loop with relative paths
+    # Use -- to handle paths starting with - (e.g., -P, -L)
+    dir="$(cd -- "$dir" 2>/dev/null && pwd)" || return 1
+    local prev_dir=""
+    while true; do
+        if [ -d "$dir/.specify" ]; then
+            echo "$dir"
+            return 0
+        fi
+        # Stop if we've reached filesystem root or dirname stops changing
+        if [ "$dir" = "/" ] || [ "$dir" = "$prev_dir" ]; then
+            break
+        fi
+        prev_dir="$dir"
+        dir="$(dirname "$dir")"
+    done
+    return 1
+}
+
+# Get repository root, prioritizing .specify directory over git
+# This prevents using a parent git repo when spec-kit is initialized in a subdirectory
+get_repo_root() {
+    # First, look for .specify directory (spec-kit's own marker)
+    local specify_root
+    if specify_root=$(find_specify_root); then
+        echo "$specify_root"
+        return
+    fi
+
+    # Fallback to git if no .specify found
+    if git rev-parse --show-toplevel >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        git rev-parse --show-toplevel
+        return
+    fi
+
+    # Final fallback to script location for non-git repos
+    local script_dir="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+    (cd "$script_dir/../../.." && pwd)
+}
+
+# Get current branch, with fallback for non-git repositories
+get_current_branch() {
+    # First check if SPECIFY_FEATURE environment variable is set
+    if [[ -n "${SPECIFY_FEATURE:-}" ]]; then
+        echo "$SPECIFY_FEATURE"
+        return
+    fi
+
+    # Then check git if available at the spec-kit root (not parent)
+    local repo_root=$(get_repo_root)
+    if has_git; then
+        git -C "$repo_root" rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
+        return
+    fi
+
+    # For non-git repos, try to find the latest feature directory
+    local specs_dir="$repo_root/specs"
+
+    if [[ -d "$specs_dir" ]]; then
+        local latest_feature=""
+        local highest=0
+        local latest_timestamp=""
+
+        for dir in "$specs_dir"/*; do
+            if [[ -d "$dir" ]]; then
+                local dirname=$(basename "$dir")
+                if [[ "$dirname" =~ ^([0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6})- ]]; then
+                    # Timestamp-based branch: compare lexicographically
+                    local ts="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"
+                    if [[ "$ts" > "$latest_timestamp" ]]; then
+                        latest_timestamp="$ts"
+                        latest_feature=$dirname
+                    fi
+                elif [[ "$dirname" =~ ^([0-9]{3,})- ]]; then
+                    local number=${BASH_REMATCH[1]}
+                    number=$((10#$number))
+                    if [[ "$number" -gt "$highest" ]]; then
+                        highest=$number
+                        # Only update if no timestamp branch found yet
+                        if [[ -z "$latest_timestamp" ]]; then
+                            latest_feature=$dirname
+                        fi
+                    fi
+                fi
+            fi
+        done
+
+        if [[ -n "$latest_feature" ]]; then
+            echo "$latest_feature"
+            return
+        fi
+    fi
+
+    echo "main"  # Final fallback
+}
+
+# Check if we have git available at the spec-kit root level
+# Returns true only if git is installed and the repo root is inside a git work tree
+# Handles both regular repos (.git directory) and worktrees/submodules (.git file)
+has_git() {
+    # First check if git command is available (before calling get_repo_root which may use git)
+    command -v git >/dev/null 2>&1 || return 1
+    local repo_root=$(get_repo_root)
+    # Check if .git exists (directory or file for worktrees/submodules)
+    [ -e "$repo_root/.git" ] || return 1
+    # Verify it's actually a valid git work tree
+    git -C "$repo_root" rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree >/dev/null 2>&1
+}
+
+# Strip a single optional path segment (e.g. gitflow "feat/004-name" -> "004-name").
+# Only when the full name is exactly two slash-free segments; otherwise returns the raw name.
+spec_kit_effective_branch_name() {
+    local raw="$1"
+    if [[ "$raw" =~ ^([^/]+)/([^/]+)$ ]]; then
+        printf '%s\n' "${BASH_REMATCH[2]}"
+    else
+        printf '%s\n' "$raw"
+    fi
+}
+
+check_feature_branch() {
+    local raw="$1"
+    local has_git_repo="$2"
+
+    # For non-git repos, we can't enforce branch naming but still provide output
+    if [[ "$has_git_repo" != "true" ]]; then
+        echo "[specify] Warning: Git repository not detected; skipped branch validation" >&2
+        return 0
+    fi
+
+    local branch
+    branch=$(spec_kit_effective_branch_name "$raw")
+
+    # Accept sequential prefix (3+ digits) but exclude malformed timestamps
+    # Malformed: 7-or-8 digit date + 6-digit time with no trailing slug (e.g. "2026031-143022" or "20260319-143022")
+    local is_sequential=false
+    if [[ "$branch" =~ ^[0-9]{3,}- ]] && [[ ! "$branch" =~ ^[0-9]{7}-[0-9]{6}- ]] && [[ ! "$branch" =~ ^[0-9]{7,8}-[0-9]{6}$ ]]; then
+        is_sequential=true
+    fi
+    if [[ "$is_sequential" != "true" ]] && [[ ! "$branch" =~ ^[0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6}- ]]; then
+        echo "ERROR: Not on a feature branch. Current branch: $raw" >&2
+        echo "Feature branches should be named like: 001-feature-name, 1234-feature-name, or 20260319-143022-feature-name" >&2
+        return 1
+    fi
+
+    return 0
+}
+
+# Safely read .specify/feature.json's "feature_directory" value.
+# Prints the raw value (possibly relative) to stdout, or empty string if the file
+# is missing, unparseable, or does not contain the key. Always returns 0 so callers
+# under `set -e` cannot be aborted by parser failure.
+# Parser order mirrors the historical get_feature_paths behavior: jq -> python3 -> grep/sed.
+read_feature_json_feature_directory() {
+    local repo_root="$1"
+    local fj="$repo_root/.specify/feature.json"
+    [[ -f "$fj" ]] || { printf '%s' ''; return 0; }
+
+    local _fd=''
+    if command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        if ! _fd=$(jq -r '.feature_directory // empty' "$fj" 2>/dev/null); then
+            _fd=''
+        fi
+    elif command -v python3 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        # Use Python so pretty-printed/multi-line JSON still parses correctly.
+        if ! _fd=$(python3 -c "import json,sys; d=json.load(open(sys.argv[1])); v=d.get('feature_directory'); print(v if v else '')" "$fj" 2>/dev/null); then
+            _fd=''
+        fi
+    else
+        # Last-resort single-line grep/sed fallback. The `|| true` guards against
+        # grep returning 1 (no match) aborting under `set -e` / `pipefail`.
+        _fd=$( { grep -E '"feature_directory"[[:space:]]*:' "$fj" 2>/dev/null || true; } \
+            | head -n 1 \
+            | sed -E 's/^[^:]*:[[:space:]]*"([^"]*)".*$/\1/' )
+    fi
+
+    printf '%s' "$_fd"
+    return 0
+}
+
+# Returns 0 when .specify/feature.json lists feature_directory that exists as a directory
+# and matches the resolved active FEATURE_DIR (so /speckit.plan can skip git branch pattern checks).
+# Delegates parsing to read_feature_json_feature_directory, which is safe under `set -e`.
+feature_json_matches_feature_dir() {
+    local repo_root="$1"
+    local active_feature_dir="$2"
+
+    local _fd
+    _fd=$(read_feature_json_feature_directory "$repo_root")
+
+    [[ -n "$_fd" ]] || return 1
+    [[ "$_fd" != /* ]] && _fd="$repo_root/$_fd"
+    [[ -d "$_fd" ]] || return 1
+
+    local norm_json norm_active
+    norm_json="$(cd -- "$_fd" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)" || return 1
+    norm_active="$(cd -- "$active_feature_dir" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)" || return 1
+
+    [[ "$norm_json" == "$norm_active" ]]
+}
+
+# Find feature directory by numeric prefix instead of exact branch match
+# This allows multiple branches to work on the same spec (e.g., 004-fix-bug, 004-add-feature)
+find_feature_dir_by_prefix() {
+    local repo_root="$1"
+    local branch_name
+    branch_name=$(spec_kit_effective_branch_name "$2")
+    local specs_dir="$repo_root/specs"
+
+    # Extract prefix from branch (e.g., "004" from "004-whatever" or "20260319-143022" from timestamp branches)
+    local prefix=""
+    if [[ "$branch_name" =~ ^([0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6})- ]]; then
+        prefix="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"
+    elif [[ "$branch_name" =~ ^([0-9]{3,})- ]]; then
+        prefix="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"
+    else
+        # If branch doesn't have a recognized prefix, fall back to exact match
+        echo "$specs_dir/$branch_name"
+        return
+    fi
+
+    # Search for directories in specs/ that start with this prefix
+    local matches=()
+    if [[ -d "$specs_dir" ]]; then
+        for dir in "$specs_dir"/"$prefix"-*; do
+            if [[ -d "$dir" ]]; then
+                matches+=("$(basename "$dir")")
+            fi
+        done
+    fi
+
+    # Handle results
+    if [[ ${#matches[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
+        # No match found - return the branch name path (will fail later with clear error)
+        echo "$specs_dir/$branch_name"
+    elif [[ ${#matches[@]} -eq 1 ]]; then
+        # Exactly one match - perfect!
+        echo "$specs_dir/${matches[0]}"
+    else
+        # Multiple matches - this shouldn't happen with proper naming convention
+        echo "ERROR: Multiple spec directories found with prefix '$prefix': ${matches[*]}" >&2
+        echo "Please ensure only one spec directory exists per prefix." >&2
+        return 1
+    fi
+}
+
+get_feature_paths() {
+    local repo_root=$(get_repo_root)
+    local current_branch=$(get_current_branch)
+    local has_git_repo="false"
+
+    if has_git; then
+        has_git_repo="true"
+    fi
+
+    # Resolve feature directory.  Priority:
+    #   1. SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY env var (explicit override)
+    #   2. .specify/feature.json "feature_directory" key (persisted by /speckit.specify)
+    #   3. Branch-name-based prefix lookup (legacy fallback)
+    local feature_dir
+    if [[ -n "${SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY:-}" ]]; then
+        feature_dir="$SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY"
+        # Normalize relative paths to absolute under repo root
+        [[ "$feature_dir" != /* ]] && feature_dir="$repo_root/$feature_dir"
+    elif [[ -f "$repo_root/.specify/feature.json" ]]; then
+        # Shared, set -e-safe parser: jq -> python3 -> grep/sed. Returns empty on
+        # missing/unparseable/unset so we fall through to the branch-prefix lookup.
+        local _fd
+        _fd=$(read_feature_json_feature_directory "$repo_root")
+        if [[ -n "$_fd" ]]; then
+            feature_dir="$_fd"
+            # Normalize relative paths to absolute under repo root
+            [[ "$feature_dir" != /* ]] && feature_dir="$repo_root/$feature_dir"
+        elif ! feature_dir=$(find_feature_dir_by_prefix "$repo_root" "$current_branch"); then
+            echo "ERROR: Failed to resolve feature directory" >&2
+            return 1
+        fi
+    elif ! feature_dir=$(find_feature_dir_by_prefix "$repo_root" "$current_branch"); then
+        echo "ERROR: Failed to resolve feature directory" >&2
+        return 1
+    fi
+
+    # Use printf '%q' to safely quote values, preventing shell injection
+    # via crafted branch names or paths containing special characters
+    printf 'REPO_ROOT=%q\n' "$repo_root"
+    printf 'CURRENT_BRANCH=%q\n' "$current_branch"
+    printf 'HAS_GIT=%q\n' "$has_git_repo"
+    printf 'FEATURE_DIR=%q\n' "$feature_dir"
+    printf 'FEATURE_SPEC=%q\n' "$feature_dir/spec.md"
+    printf 'IMPL_PLAN=%q\n' "$feature_dir/plan.md"
+    printf 'TASKS=%q\n' "$feature_dir/tasks.md"
+    printf 'RESEARCH=%q\n' "$feature_dir/research.md"
+    printf 'DATA_MODEL=%q\n' "$feature_dir/data-model.md"
+    printf 'QUICKSTART=%q\n' "$feature_dir/quickstart.md"
+    printf 'CONTRACTS_DIR=%q\n' "$feature_dir/contracts"
+}
+
+# Check if jq is available for safe JSON construction
+has_jq() {
+    command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1
+}
+
+# Escape a string for safe embedding in a JSON value (fallback when jq is unavailable).
+# Handles backslash, double-quote, and JSON-required control character escapes (RFC 8259).
+json_escape() {
+    local s="$1"
+    s="${s//\\/\\\\}"
+    s="${s//\"/\\\"}"
+    s="${s//$'\n'/\\n}"
+    s="${s//$'\t'/\\t}"
+    s="${s//$'\r'/\\r}"
+    s="${s//$'\b'/\\b}"
+    s="${s//$'\f'/\\f}"
+    # Escape any remaining U+0001-U+001F control characters as \uXXXX.
+    # (U+0000/NUL cannot appear in bash strings and is excluded.)
+    # LC_ALL=C ensures ${#s} counts bytes and ${s:$i:1} yields single bytes,
+    # so multi-byte UTF-8 sequences (first byte >= 0xC0) pass through intact.
+    local LC_ALL=C
+    local i char code
+    for (( i=0; i<${#s}; i++ )); do
+        char="${s:$i:1}"
+        printf -v code '%d' "'$char" 2>/dev/null || code=256
+        if (( code >= 1 && code <= 31 )); then
+            printf '\\u%04x' "$code"
+        else
+            printf '%s' "$char"
+        fi
+    done
+}
+
+check_file() { [[ -f "$1" ]] && echo "  ✓ $2" || echo "  ✗ $2"; }
+check_dir() { [[ -d "$1" && -n $(ls -A "$1" 2>/dev/null) ]] && echo "  ✓ $2" || echo "  ✗ $2"; }
+
+# Resolve a template name to a file path using the priority stack:
+#   1. .specify/templates/overrides/
+#   2. .specify/presets/<preset-id>/templates/ (sorted by priority from .registry)
+#   3. .specify/extensions/<ext-id>/templates/
+#   4. .specify/templates/ (core)
+resolve_template() {
+    local template_name="$1"
+    local repo_root="$2"
+    local base="$repo_root/.specify/templates"
+
+    # Priority 1: Project overrides
+    local override="$base/overrides/${template_name}.md"
+    [ -f "$override" ] && echo "$override" && return 0
+
+    # Priority 2: Installed presets (sorted by priority from .registry)
+    local presets_dir="$repo_root/.specify/presets"
+    if [ -d "$presets_dir" ]; then
+        local registry_file="$presets_dir/.registry"
+        if [ -f "$registry_file" ] && command -v python3 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+            # Read preset IDs sorted by priority (lower number = higher precedence).
+            # The python3 call is wrapped in an if-condition so that set -e does not
+            # abort the function when python3 exits non-zero (e.g. invalid JSON).
+            local sorted_presets=""
+            if sorted_presets=$(SPECKIT_REGISTRY="$registry_file" python3 -c "
+import json, sys, os
+try:
+    with open(os.environ['SPECKIT_REGISTRY']) as f:
+        data = json.load(f)
+    presets = data.get('presets', {})
+    for pid, meta in sorted(presets.items(), key=lambda x: x[1].get('priority', 10) if isinstance(x[1], dict) else 10):
+        if isinstance(meta, dict) and meta.get('enabled', True) is not False:
+            print(pid)
+except Exception:
+    sys.exit(1)
+" 2>/dev/null); then
+                if [ -n "$sorted_presets" ]; then
+                    # python3 succeeded and returned preset IDs — search in priority order
+                    while IFS= read -r preset_id; do
+                        local candidate="$presets_dir/$preset_id/templates/${template_name}.md"
+                        [ -f "$candidate" ] && echo "$candidate" && return 0
+                    done <<< "$sorted_presets"
+                fi
+                # python3 succeeded but registry has no presets — nothing to search
+            else
+                # python3 failed (missing, or registry parse error) — fall back to unordered directory scan
+                for preset in "$presets_dir"/*/; do
+                    [ -d "$preset" ] || continue
+                    local candidate="$preset/templates/${template_name}.md"
+                    [ -f "$candidate" ] && echo "$candidate" && return 0
+                done
+            fi
+        else
+            # Fallback: alphabetical directory order (no python3 available)
+            for preset in "$presets_dir"/*/; do
+                [ -d "$preset" ] || continue
+                local candidate="$preset/templates/${template_name}.md"
+                [ -f "$candidate" ] && echo "$candidate" && return 0
+            done
+        fi
+    fi
+
+    # Priority 3: Extension-provided templates
+    local ext_dir="$repo_root/.specify/extensions"
+    if [ -d "$ext_dir" ]; then
+        for ext in "$ext_dir"/*/; do
+            [ -d "$ext" ] || continue
+            # Skip hidden directories (e.g. .backup, .cache)
+            case "$(basename "$ext")" in .*) continue;; esac
+            local candidate="$ext/templates/${template_name}.md"
+            [ -f "$candidate" ] && echo "$candidate" && return 0
+        done
+    fi
+
+    # Priority 4: Core templates
+    local core="$base/${template_name}.md"
+    [ -f "$core" ] && echo "$core" && return 0
+
+    # Template not found in any location.
+    # Return 1 so callers can distinguish "not found" from "found".
+    # Callers running under set -e should use: TEMPLATE=$(resolve_template ...) || true
+    return 1
+}
+
+# Resolve a template name to composed content using composition strategies.
+# Reads strategy metadata from preset manifests and composes content
+# from multiple layers using prepend, append, or wrap strategies.
+#
+# Usage: CONTENT=$(resolve_template_content "template-name" "$REPO_ROOT")
+# Returns composed content string on stdout; exit code 1 if not found.
+resolve_template_content() {
+    local template_name="$1"
+    local repo_root="$2"
+    local base="$repo_root/.specify/templates"
+
+    # Collect all layers (highest priority first)
+    local -a layer_paths=()
+    local -a layer_strategies=()
+
+    # Priority 1: Project overrides (always "replace")
+    local override="$base/overrides/${template_name}.md"
+    if [ -f "$override" ]; then
+        layer_paths+=("$override")
+        layer_strategies+=("replace")
+    fi
+
+    # Priority 2: Installed presets (sorted by priority from .registry)
+    local presets_dir="$repo_root/.specify/presets"
+    if [ -d "$presets_dir" ]; then
+        local registry_file="$presets_dir/.registry"
+        local sorted_presets=""
+        if [ -f "$registry_file" ] && command -v python3 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+            if sorted_presets=$(SPECKIT_REGISTRY="$registry_file" python3 -c "
+import json, sys, os
+try:
+    with open(os.environ['SPECKIT_REGISTRY']) as f:
+        data = json.load(f)
+    presets = data.get('presets', {})
+    for pid, meta in sorted(presets.items(), key=lambda x: x[1].get('priority', 10) if isinstance(x[1], dict) else 10):
+        if isinstance(meta, dict) and meta.get('enabled', True) is not False:
+            print(pid)
+except Exception:
+    sys.exit(1)
+" 2>/dev/null); then
+                if [ -n "$sorted_presets" ]; then
+                    local yaml_warned=false
+                    while IFS= read -r preset_id; do
+                        # Read strategy and file path from preset manifest
+                        local strategy="replace"
+                        local manifest_file=""
+                        local manifest="$presets_dir/$preset_id/preset.yml"
+                        if [ -f "$manifest" ] && command -v python3 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+                            # Requires PyYAML; falls back to replace/convention if unavailable
+                            local result
+                            local py_stderr
+                            py_stderr=$(mktemp)
+                            result=$(SPECKIT_MANIFEST="$manifest" SPECKIT_TMPL="$template_name" python3 -c "
+import sys, os
+try:
+    import yaml
+except ImportError:
+    print('yaml_missing', file=sys.stderr)
+    print('replace\t')
+    sys.exit(0)
+try:
+    with open(os.environ['SPECKIT_MANIFEST']) as f:
+        data = yaml.safe_load(f)
+    for t in data.get('provides', {}).get('templates', []):
+        if t.get('name') == os.environ['SPECKIT_TMPL'] and t.get('type', 'template') == 'template':
+            print(t.get('strategy', 'replace') + '\t' + t.get('file', ''))
+            sys.exit(0)
+    print('replace\t')
+except Exception:
+    print('replace\t')
+" 2>"$py_stderr")
+                            local parse_status=$?
+                            if [ $parse_status -eq 0 ] && [ -n "$result" ]; then
+                                IFS=$'\t' read -r strategy manifest_file <<< "$result"
+                                strategy=$(printf '%s' "$strategy" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')
+                            fi
+                            if [ "$yaml_warned" = false ] && grep -q 'yaml_missing' "$py_stderr" 2>/dev/null; then
+                                echo "Warning: PyYAML not available; composition strategies may be ignored" >&2
+                                yaml_warned=true
+                            fi
+                            rm -f "$py_stderr"
+                        fi
+                        # Try manifest file path first, then convention path
+                        local candidate=""
+                        if [ -n "$manifest_file" ]; then
+                            # Reject absolute paths and parent traversal
+                            case "$manifest_file" in
+                                /*|*../*|../*) manifest_file="" ;;
+                            esac
+                        fi
+                        if [ -n "$manifest_file" ]; then
+                            local mf="$presets_dir/$preset_id/$manifest_file"
+                            [ -f "$mf" ] && candidate="$mf"
+                        fi
+                        if [ -z "$candidate" ]; then
+                            local cf="$presets_dir/$preset_id/templates/${template_name}.md"
+                            [ -f "$cf" ] && candidate="$cf"
+                        fi
+                        if [ -n "$candidate" ]; then
+                            layer_paths+=("$candidate")
+                            layer_strategies+=("$strategy")
+                        fi
+                    done <<< "$sorted_presets"
+                fi
+            else
+                # python3 failed — fall back to unordered directory scan (replace only)
+                for preset in "$presets_dir"/*/; do
+                    [ -d "$preset" ] || continue
+                    local candidate="$preset/templates/${template_name}.md"
+                    if [ -f "$candidate" ]; then
+                        layer_paths+=("$candidate")
+                        layer_strategies+=("replace")
+                    fi
+                done
+            fi
+        else
+            # No python3 or registry — fall back to unordered directory scan (replace only)
+            for preset in "$presets_dir"/*/; do
+                [ -d "$preset" ] || continue
+                local candidate="$preset/templates/${template_name}.md"
+                if [ -f "$candidate" ]; then
+                    layer_paths+=("$candidate")
+                    layer_strategies+=("replace")
+                fi
+            done
+        fi
+    fi
+
+    # Priority 3: Extension-provided templates (always "replace")
+    local ext_dir="$repo_root/.specify/extensions"
+    if [ -d "$ext_dir" ]; then
+        for ext in "$ext_dir"/*/; do
+            [ -d "$ext" ] || continue
+            case "$(basename "$ext")" in .*) continue;; esac
+            local candidate="$ext/templates/${template_name}.md"
+            if [ -f "$candidate" ]; then
+                layer_paths+=("$candidate")
+                layer_strategies+=("replace")
+            fi
+        done
+    fi
+
+    # Priority 4: Core templates (always "replace")
+    local core="$base/${template_name}.md"
+    if [ -f "$core" ]; then
+        layer_paths+=("$core")
+        layer_strategies+=("replace")
+    fi
+
+    local count=${#layer_paths[@]}
+    [ "$count" -eq 0 ] && return 1
+
+    # Check if any layer uses a non-replace strategy
+    local has_composition=false
+    for s in "${layer_strategies[@]}"; do
+        [ "$s" != "replace" ] && has_composition=true && break
+    done
+
+    # If the top (highest-priority) layer is replace, it wins entirely —
+    # lower layers are irrelevant regardless of their strategies.
+    if [ "${layer_strategies[0]}" = "replace" ]; then
+        cat "${layer_paths[0]}"
+        return 0
+    fi
+
+    if [ "$has_composition" = false ]; then
+        cat "${layer_paths[0]}"
+        return 0
+    fi
+
+    # Find the effective base: scan from highest priority (index 0) downward
+    # to find the nearest replace layer. Only compose layers above that base.
+    local base_idx=-1
+    local i
+    for (( i=0; i<count; i++ )); do
+        if [ "${layer_strategies[$i]}" = "replace" ]; then
+            base_idx=$i
+            break
+        fi
+    done
+
+    if [ $base_idx -lt 0 ]; then
+        return 1  # no base layer found
+    fi
+
+    # Read the base content; compose layers above the base (higher priority)
+    local content
+    content=$(cat "${layer_paths[$base_idx]}"; printf x)
+    content="${content%x}"
+
+    for (( i=base_idx-1; i>=0; i-- )); do
+        local path="${layer_paths[$i]}"
+        local strat="${layer_strategies[$i]}"
+        local layer_content
+        # Preserve trailing newlines
+        layer_content=$(cat "$path"; printf x)
+        layer_content="${layer_content%x}"
+
+        case "$strat" in
+            replace) content="$layer_content" ;;
+            prepend) content="$(printf '%s\n\n%s' "$layer_content" "$content")" ;;
+            append)  content="$(printf '%s\n\n%s' "$content" "$layer_content")" ;;
+            wrap)
+                case "$layer_content" in
+                    *'{CORE_TEMPLATE}'*) ;;
+                    *) echo "Error: wrap strategy missing {CORE_TEMPLATE} placeholder" >&2; return 1 ;;
+                esac
+                while [[ "$layer_content" == *'{CORE_TEMPLATE}'* ]]; do
+                    local before="${layer_content%%\{CORE_TEMPLATE\}*}"
+                    local after="${layer_content#*\{CORE_TEMPLATE\}}"
+                    layer_content="${before}${content}${after}"
+                done
+                content="$layer_content"
+                ;;
+            *) echo "Error: unknown strategy '$strat'" >&2; return 1 ;;
+        esac
+    done
+
+    printf '%s' "$content"
+    return 0
+}
+

.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,413 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+set -e
+
+JSON_MODE=false
+DRY_RUN=false
+ALLOW_EXISTING=false
+SHORT_NAME=""
+BRANCH_NUMBER=""
+USE_TIMESTAMP=false
+ARGS=()
+i=1
+while [ $i -le $# ]; do
+    arg="${!i}"
+    case "$arg" in
+        --json)
+            JSON_MODE=true
+            ;;
+        --dry-run)
+            DRY_RUN=true
+            ;;
+        --allow-existing-branch)
+            ALLOW_EXISTING=true
+            ;;
+        --short-name)
+            if [ $((i + 1)) -gt $# ]; then
+                echo 'Error: --short-name requires a value' >&2
+                exit 1
+            fi
+            i=$((i + 1))
+            next_arg="${!i}"
+            # Check if the next argument is another option (starts with --)
+            if [[ "$next_arg" == --* ]]; then
+                echo 'Error: --short-name requires a value' >&2
+                exit 1
+            fi
+            SHORT_NAME="$next_arg"
+            ;;
+        --number)
+            if [ $((i + 1)) -gt $# ]; then
+                echo 'Error: --number requires a value' >&2
+                exit 1
+            fi
+            i=$((i + 1))
+            next_arg="${!i}"
+            if [[ "$next_arg" == --* ]]; then
+                echo 'Error: --number requires a value' >&2
+                exit 1
+            fi
+            BRANCH_NUMBER="$next_arg"
+            ;;
+        --timestamp)
+            USE_TIMESTAMP=true
+            ;;
+        --help|-h)
+            echo "Usage: $0 [--json] [--dry-run] [--allow-existing-branch] [--short-name <name>] [--number N] [--timestamp] <feature_description>"
+            echo ""
+            echo "Options:"
+            echo "  --json              Output in JSON format"
+            echo "  --dry-run           Compute branch name and paths without creating branches, directories, or files"
+            echo "  --allow-existing-branch  Switch to branch if it already exists instead of failing"
+            echo "  --short-name <name> Provide a custom short name (2-4 words) for the branch"
+            echo "  --number N          Specify branch number manually (overrides auto-detection)"
+            echo "  --timestamp         Use timestamp prefix (YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS) instead of sequential numbering"
+            echo "  --help, -h          Show this help message"
+            echo ""
+            echo "Examples:"
+            echo "  $0 'Add user authentication system' --short-name 'user-auth'"
+            echo "  $0 'Implement OAuth2 integration for API' --number 5"
+            echo "  $0 --timestamp --short-name 'user-auth' 'Add user authentication'"
+            exit 0
+            ;;
+        *)
+            ARGS+=("$arg")
+            ;;
+    esac
+    i=$((i + 1))
+done
+
+FEATURE_DESCRIPTION="${ARGS[*]}"
+if [ -z "$FEATURE_DESCRIPTION" ]; then
+    echo "Usage: $0 [--json] [--dry-run] [--allow-existing-branch] [--short-name <name>] [--number N] [--timestamp] <feature_description>" >&2
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# Trim whitespace and validate description is not empty (e.g., user passed only whitespace)
+FEATURE_DESCRIPTION=$(echo "$FEATURE_DESCRIPTION" | sed -E 's/^[[:space:]]+|[[:space:]]+$//g')
+if [ -z "$FEATURE_DESCRIPTION" ]; then
+    echo "Error: Feature description cannot be empty or contain only whitespace" >&2
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# Function to get highest number from specs directory
+get_highest_from_specs() {
+    local specs_dir="$1"
+    local highest=0
+    
+    if [ -d "$specs_dir" ]; then
+        for dir in "$specs_dir"/*; do
+            [ -d "$dir" ] || continue
+            dirname=$(basename "$dir")
+            # Match sequential prefixes (>=3 digits), but skip timestamp dirs.
+            if echo "$dirname" | grep -Eq '^[0-9]{3,}-' && ! echo "$dirname" | grep -Eq '^[0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6}-'; then
+                number=$(echo "$dirname" | grep -Eo '^[0-9]+')
+                number=$((10#$number))
+                if [ "$number" -gt "$highest" ]; then
+                    highest=$number
+                fi
+            fi
+        done
+    fi
+    
+    echo "$highest"
+}
+
+# Function to get highest number from git branches
+get_highest_from_branches() {
+    git branch -a 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^[* ]*//; s|^remotes/[^/]*/||' | _extract_highest_number
+}
+
+# Extract the highest sequential feature number from a list of ref names (one per line).
+# Shared by get_highest_from_branches and get_highest_from_remote_refs.
+_extract_highest_number() {
+    local highest=0
+    while IFS= read -r name; do
+        [ -z "$name" ] && continue
+        if echo "$name" | grep -Eq '^[0-9]{3,}-' && ! echo "$name" | grep -Eq '^[0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6}-'; then
+            number=$(echo "$name" | grep -Eo '^[0-9]+' || echo "0")
+            number=$((10#$number))
+            if [ "$number" -gt "$highest" ]; then
+                highest=$number
+            fi
+        fi
+    done
+    echo "$highest"
+}
+
+# Function to get highest number from remote branches without fetching (side-effect-free)
+get_highest_from_remote_refs() {
+    local highest=0
+
+    for remote in $(git remote 2>/dev/null); do
+        local remote_highest
+        remote_highest=$(GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT=0 git ls-remote --heads "$remote" 2>/dev/null | sed 's|.*refs/heads/||' | _extract_highest_number)
+        if [ "$remote_highest" -gt "$highest" ]; then
+            highest=$remote_highest
+        fi
+    done
+
+    echo "$highest"
+}
+
+# Function to check existing branches (local and remote) and return next available number.
+# When skip_fetch is true, queries remotes via ls-remote (read-only) instead of fetching.
+check_existing_branches() {
+    local specs_dir="$1"
+    local skip_fetch="${2:-false}"
+
+    if [ "$skip_fetch" = true ]; then
+        # Side-effect-free: query remotes via ls-remote
+        local highest_remote=$(get_highest_from_remote_refs)
+        local highest_branch=$(get_highest_from_branches)
+        if [ "$highest_remote" -gt "$highest_branch" ]; then
+            highest_branch=$highest_remote
+        fi
+    else
+        # Fetch all remotes to get latest branch info (suppress errors if no remotes)
+        git fetch --all --prune >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
+        local highest_branch=$(get_highest_from_branches)
+    fi
+
+    # Get highest number from ALL specs (not just matching short name)
+    local highest_spec=$(get_highest_from_specs "$specs_dir")
+
+    # Take the maximum of both
+    local max_num=$highest_branch
+    if [ "$highest_spec" -gt "$max_num" ]; then
+        max_num=$highest_spec
+    fi
+
+    # Return next number
+    echo $((max_num + 1))
+}
+
+# Function to clean and format a branch name
+clean_branch_name() {
+    local name="$1"
+    echo "$name" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | sed 's/[^a-z0-9]/-/g' | sed 's/-\+/-/g' | sed 's/^-//' | sed 's/-$//'
+}
+
+# Resolve repository root using common.sh functions which prioritize .specify over git
+SCRIPT_DIR="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
+
+REPO_ROOT=$(get_repo_root)
+
+# Check if git is available at this repo root (not a parent)
+if has_git; then
+    HAS_GIT=true
+else
+    HAS_GIT=false
+fi
+
+cd "$REPO_ROOT"
+
+SPECS_DIR="$REPO_ROOT/specs"
+if [ "$DRY_RUN" != true ]; then
+    mkdir -p "$SPECS_DIR"
+fi
+
+# Function to generate branch name with stop word filtering and length filtering
+generate_branch_name() {
+    local description="$1"
+    
+    # Common stop words to filter out
+    local stop_words="^(i|a|an|the|to|for|of|in|on|at|by|with|from|is|are|was|were|be|been|being|have|has|had|do|does|did|will|would|should|could|can|may|might|must|shall|this|that|these|those|my|your|our|their|want|need|add|get|set)$"
+    
+    # Convert to lowercase and split into words
+    local clean_name=$(echo "$description" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | sed 's/[^a-z0-9]/ /g')
+    
+    # Filter words: remove stop words and words shorter than 3 chars (unless they're uppercase acronyms in original)
+    local meaningful_words=()
+    for word in $clean_name; do
+        # Skip empty words
+        [ -z "$word" ] && continue
+        
+        # Keep words that are NOT stop words AND (length >= 3 OR are potential acronyms)
+        if ! echo "$word" | grep -qiE "$stop_words"; then
+            if [ ${#word} -ge 3 ]; then
+                meaningful_words+=("$word")
+            elif echo "$description" | grep -q "\b${word^^}\b"; then
+                # Keep short words if they appear as uppercase in original (likely acronyms)
+                meaningful_words+=("$word")
+            fi
+        fi
+    done
+    
+    # If we have meaningful words, use first 3-4 of them
+    if [ ${#meaningful_words[@]} -gt 0 ]; then
+        local max_words=3
+        if [ ${#meaningful_words[@]} -eq 4 ]; then max_words=4; fi
+        
+        local result=""
+        local count=0
+        for word in "${meaningful_words[@]}"; do
+            if [ $count -ge $max_words ]; then break; fi
+            if [ -n "$result" ]; then result="$result-"; fi
+            result="$result$word"
+            count=$((count + 1))
+        done
+        echo "$result"
+    else
+        # Fallback to original logic if no meaningful words found
+        local cleaned=$(clean_branch_name "$description")
+        echo "$cleaned" | tr '-' '\n' | grep -v '^$' | head -3 | tr '\n' '-' | sed 's/-$//'
+    fi
+}
+
+# Generate branch name
+if [ -n "$SHORT_NAME" ]; then
+    # Use provided short name, just clean it up
+    BRANCH_SUFFIX=$(clean_branch_name "$SHORT_NAME")
+else
+    # Generate from description with smart filtering
+    BRANCH_SUFFIX=$(generate_branch_name "$FEATURE_DESCRIPTION")
+fi
+
+# Warn if --number and --timestamp are both specified
+if [ "$USE_TIMESTAMP" = true ] && [ -n "$BRANCH_NUMBER" ]; then
+    >&2 echo "[specify] Warning: --number is ignored when --timestamp is used"
+    BRANCH_NUMBER=""
+fi
+
+# Determine branch prefix
+if [ "$USE_TIMESTAMP" = true ]; then
+    FEATURE_NUM=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+    BRANCH_NAME="${FEATURE_NUM}-${BRANCH_SUFFIX}"
+else
+    # Determine branch number
+    if [ -z "$BRANCH_NUMBER" ]; then
+        if [ "$DRY_RUN" = true ] && [ "$HAS_GIT" = true ]; then
+            # Dry-run: query remotes via ls-remote (side-effect-free, no fetch)
+            BRANCH_NUMBER=$(check_existing_branches "$SPECS_DIR" true)
+        elif [ "$DRY_RUN" = true ]; then
+            # Dry-run without git: local spec dirs only
+            HIGHEST=$(get_highest_from_specs "$SPECS_DIR")
+            BRANCH_NUMBER=$((HIGHEST + 1))
+        elif [ "$HAS_GIT" = true ]; then
+            # Check existing branches on remotes
+            BRANCH_NUMBER=$(check_existing_branches "$SPECS_DIR")
+        else
+            # Fall back to local directory check
+            HIGHEST=$(get_highest_from_specs "$SPECS_DIR")
+            BRANCH_NUMBER=$((HIGHEST + 1))
+        fi
+    fi
+
+    # Force base-10 interpretation to prevent octal conversion (e.g., 010 → 8 in octal, but should be 10 in decimal)
+    FEATURE_NUM=$(printf "%03d" "$((10#$BRANCH_NUMBER))")
+    BRANCH_NAME="${FEATURE_NUM}-${BRANCH_SUFFIX}"
+fi
+
+# GitHub enforces a 244-byte limit on branch names
+# Validate and truncate if necessary
+MAX_BRANCH_LENGTH=244
+if [ ${#BRANCH_NAME} -gt $MAX_BRANCH_LENGTH ]; then
+    # Calculate how much we need to trim from suffix
+    # Account for prefix length: timestamp (15) + hyphen (1) = 16, or sequential (3) + hyphen (1) = 4
+    PREFIX_LENGTH=$(( ${#FEATURE_NUM} + 1 ))
+    MAX_SUFFIX_LENGTH=$((MAX_BRANCH_LENGTH - PREFIX_LENGTH))
+    
+    # Truncate suffix at word boundary if possible
+    TRUNCATED_SUFFIX=$(echo "$BRANCH_SUFFIX" | cut -c1-$MAX_SUFFIX_LENGTH)
+    # Remove trailing hyphen if truncation created one
+    TRUNCATED_SUFFIX=$(echo "$TRUNCATED_SUFFIX" | sed 's/-$//')
+    
+    ORIGINAL_BRANCH_NAME="$BRANCH_NAME"
+    BRANCH_NAME="${FEATURE_NUM}-${TRUNCATED_SUFFIX}"
+    
+    >&2 echo "[specify] Warning: Branch name exceeded GitHub's 244-byte limit"
+    >&2 echo "[specify] Original: $ORIGINAL_BRANCH_NAME (${#ORIGINAL_BRANCH_NAME} bytes)"
+    >&2 echo "[specify] Truncated to: $BRANCH_NAME (${#BRANCH_NAME} bytes)"
+fi
+
+FEATURE_DIR="$SPECS_DIR/$BRANCH_NAME"
+SPEC_FILE="$FEATURE_DIR/spec.md"
+
+if [ "$DRY_RUN" != true ]; then
+    if [ "$HAS_GIT" = true ]; then
+        branch_create_error=""
+        if ! branch_create_error=$(git checkout -q -b "$BRANCH_NAME" 2>&1); then
+            current_branch="$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null || true)"
+            # Check if branch already exists
+            if git branch --list "$BRANCH_NAME" | grep -q .; then
+                if [ "$ALLOW_EXISTING" = true ]; then
+                    # If we're already on the branch, continue without another checkout.
+                    if [ "$current_branch" = "$BRANCH_NAME" ]; then
+                        :
+                    # Otherwise switch to the existing branch instead of failing.
+                    elif ! switch_branch_error=$(git checkout -q "$BRANCH_NAME" 2>&1); then
+                        >&2 echo "Error: Failed to switch to existing branch '$BRANCH_NAME'. Please resolve any local changes or conflicts and try again."
+                        if [ -n "$switch_branch_error" ]; then
+                            >&2 printf '%s\n' "$switch_branch_error"
+                        fi
+                        exit 1
+                    fi
+                elif [ "$USE_TIMESTAMP" = true ]; then
+                    >&2 echo "Error: Branch '$BRANCH_NAME' already exists. Rerun to get a new timestamp or use a different --short-name."
+                    exit 1
+                else
+                    >&2 echo "Error: Branch '$BRANCH_NAME' already exists. Please use a different feature name or specify a different number with --number."
+                    exit 1
+                fi
+            else
+                >&2 echo "Error: Failed to create git branch '$BRANCH_NAME'."
+                if [ -n "$branch_create_error" ]; then
+                    >&2 printf '%s\n' "$branch_create_error"
+                else
+                    >&2 echo "Please check your git configuration and try again."
+                fi
+                exit 1
+            fi
+        fi
+    else
+        >&2 echo "[specify] Warning: Git repository not detected; skipped branch creation for $BRANCH_NAME"
+    fi
+
+    mkdir -p "$FEATURE_DIR"
+
+    if [ ! -f "$SPEC_FILE" ]; then
+        TEMPLATE=$(resolve_template "spec-template" "$REPO_ROOT") || true
+        if [ -n "$TEMPLATE" ] && [ -f "$TEMPLATE" ]; then
+            cp "$TEMPLATE" "$SPEC_FILE"
+        else
+            echo "Warning: Spec template not found; created empty spec file" >&2
+            touch "$SPEC_FILE"
+        fi
+    fi
+
+    # Inform the user how to persist the feature variable in their own shell
+    printf '# To persist: export SPECIFY_FEATURE=%q\n' "$BRANCH_NAME" >&2
+fi
+
+if $JSON_MODE; then
+    if command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        if [ "$DRY_RUN" = true ]; then
+            jq -cn \
+                --arg branch_name "$BRANCH_NAME" \
+                --arg spec_file "$SPEC_FILE" \
+                --arg feature_num "$FEATURE_NUM" \
+                '{BRANCH_NAME:$branch_name,SPEC_FILE:$spec_file,FEATURE_NUM:$feature_num,DRY_RUN:true}'
+        else
+            jq -cn \
+                --arg branch_name "$BRANCH_NAME" \
+                --arg spec_file "$SPEC_FILE" \
+                --arg feature_num "$FEATURE_NUM" \
+                '{BRANCH_NAME:$branch_name,SPEC_FILE:$spec_file,FEATURE_NUM:$feature_num}'
+        fi
+    else
+        if [ "$DRY_RUN" = true ]; then
+            printf '{"BRANCH_NAME":"%s","SPEC_FILE":"%s","FEATURE_NUM":"%s","DRY_RUN":true}\n' "$(json_escape "$BRANCH_NAME")" "$(json_escape "$SPEC_FILE")" "$(json_escape "$FEATURE_NUM")"
+        else
+            printf '{"BRANCH_NAME":"%s","SPEC_FILE":"%s","FEATURE_NUM":"%s"}\n' "$(json_escape "$BRANCH_NAME")" "$(json_escape "$SPEC_FILE")" "$(json_escape "$FEATURE_NUM")"
+        fi
+    fi
+else
+    echo "BRANCH_NAME: $BRANCH_NAME"
+    echo "SPEC_FILE: $SPEC_FILE"
+    echo "FEATURE_NUM: $FEATURE_NUM"
+    if [ "$DRY_RUN" != true ]; then
+        printf '# To persist in your shell: export SPECIFY_FEATURE=%q\n' "$BRANCH_NAME"
+    fi
+fi

.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+set -e
+
+# Parse command line arguments
+JSON_MODE=false
+ARGS=()
+
+for arg in "$@"; do
+    case "$arg" in
+        --json) 
+            JSON_MODE=true 
+            ;;
+        --help|-h) 
+            echo "Usage: $0 [--json]"
+            echo "  --json    Output results in JSON format"
+            echo "  --help    Show this help message"
+            exit 0 
+            ;;
+        *) 
+            ARGS+=("$arg") 
+            ;;
+    esac
+done
+
+# Get script directory and load common functions
+SCRIPT_DIR="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
+
+# Get all paths and variables from common functions
+_paths_output=$(get_feature_paths) || { echo "ERROR: Failed to resolve feature paths" >&2; exit 1; }
+eval "$_paths_output"
+unset _paths_output
+
+# If feature.json pins an existing feature directory, branch naming is not required.
+if ! feature_json_matches_feature_dir "$REPO_ROOT" "$FEATURE_DIR"; then
+    check_feature_branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" "$HAS_GIT" || exit 1
+fi
+
+# Ensure the feature directory exists
+mkdir -p "$FEATURE_DIR"
+
+# Copy plan template if it exists
+TEMPLATE=$(resolve_template "plan-template" "$REPO_ROOT") || true
+if [[ -n "$TEMPLATE" ]] && [[ -f "$TEMPLATE" ]]; then
+    cp "$TEMPLATE" "$IMPL_PLAN"
+    echo "Copied plan template to $IMPL_PLAN"
+else
+    echo "Warning: Plan template not found"
+    # Create a basic plan file if template doesn't exist
+    touch "$IMPL_PLAN"
+fi
+
+# Output results
+if $JSON_MODE; then
+    if has_jq; then
+        jq -cn \
+            --arg feature_spec "$FEATURE_SPEC" \
+            --arg impl_plan "$IMPL_PLAN" \
+            --arg specs_dir "$FEATURE_DIR" \
+            --arg branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" \
+            --arg has_git "$HAS_GIT" \
+            '{FEATURE_SPEC:$feature_spec,IMPL_PLAN:$impl_plan,SPECS_DIR:$specs_dir,BRANCH:$branch,HAS_GIT:$has_git}'
+    else
+        printf '{"FEATURE_SPEC":"%s","IMPL_PLAN":"%s","SPECS_DIR":"%s","BRANCH":"%s","HAS_GIT":"%s"}\n' \
+            "$(json_escape "$FEATURE_SPEC")" "$(json_escape "$IMPL_PLAN")" "$(json_escape "$FEATURE_DIR")" "$(json_escape "$CURRENT_BRANCH")" "$(json_escape "$HAS_GIT")"
+    fi
+else
+    echo "FEATURE_SPEC: $FEATURE_SPEC"
+    echo "IMPL_PLAN: $IMPL_PLAN" 
+    echo "SPECS_DIR: $FEATURE_DIR"
+    echo "BRANCH: $CURRENT_BRANCH"
+    echo "HAS_GIT: $HAS_GIT"
+fi
+

.specify/scripts/bash/setup-tasks.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+set -e
+
+# Parse command line arguments
+JSON_MODE=false
+
+for arg in "$@"; do
+    case "$arg" in
+        --json) JSON_MODE=true ;;
+        --help|-h)
+            echo "Usage: $0 [--json]"
+            echo "  --json    Output results in JSON format"
+            echo "  --help    Show this help message"
+            exit 0
+            ;;
+        *) echo "ERROR: Unknown option '$arg'" >&2; exit 1 ;;
+    esac
+done
+
+# Source common functions
+SCRIPT_DIR="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
+
+# Get feature paths
+_paths_output=$(get_feature_paths) || { echo "ERROR: Failed to resolve feature paths" >&2; exit 1; }
+eval "$_paths_output"
+unset _paths_output
+
+# Validate branch
+# If feature.json pins an existing feature directory, branch naming is not required.
+if ! feature_json_matches_feature_dir "$REPO_ROOT" "$FEATURE_DIR"; then
+    check_feature_branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" "$HAS_GIT" || exit 1
+fi
+
+if [[ ! -f "$IMPL_PLAN" ]]; then
+    echo "ERROR: plan.md not found in $FEATURE_DIR" >&2
+    echo "Run /speckit.plan first to create the implementation plan." >&2
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+if [[ ! -f "$FEATURE_SPEC" ]]; then
+    echo "ERROR: spec.md not found in $FEATURE_DIR" >&2
+    echo "Run /speckit.specify first to create the feature structure." >&2
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# Build available docs list
+docs=()
+[[ -f "$RESEARCH" ]] && docs+=("research.md")
+[[ -f "$DATA_MODEL" ]] && docs+=("data-model.md")
+if [[ -d "$CONTRACTS_DIR" ]] && [[ -n "$(ls -A "$CONTRACTS_DIR" 2>/dev/null)" ]]; then
+    docs+=("contracts/")
+fi
+[[ -f "$QUICKSTART" ]] && docs+=("quickstart.md")
+
+# Resolve tasks template through override stack
+TASKS_TEMPLATE=$(resolve_template "tasks-template" "$REPO_ROOT") || true
+if [[ -z "$TASKS_TEMPLATE" ]] || [[ ! -f "$TASKS_TEMPLATE" ]]; then
+    echo "ERROR: Could not resolve required tasks-template from the template override stack for $REPO_ROOT" >&2
+    echo "Template 'tasks-template' was not found in any supported location (overrides, presets, extensions, or shared core). Add an override at .specify/templates/overrides/tasks-template.md, or run 'specify init' / reinstall shared infra to restore the core .specify/templates/tasks-template.md template." >&2
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# Output results
+if $JSON_MODE; then
+    if has_jq; then
+        if [[ ${#docs[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
+            json_docs="[]"
+        else
+            json_docs=$(printf '%s\n' "${docs[@]}" | jq -R . | jq -s .)
+        fi
+        jq -cn \
+            --arg feature_dir "$FEATURE_DIR" \
+            --argjson docs "$json_docs" \
+            --arg tasks_template "${TASKS_TEMPLATE:-}" \
+            '{FEATURE_DIR:$feature_dir,AVAILABLE_DOCS:$docs,TASKS_TEMPLATE:$tasks_template}'
+    else
+        if [[ ${#docs[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
+            json_docs="[]"
+        else
+            json_docs=$(for d in "${docs[@]}"; do printf '"%s",' "$(json_escape "$d")"; done)
+            json_docs="[${json_docs%,}]"
+        fi
+        printf '{"FEATURE_DIR":"%s","AVAILABLE_DOCS":%s,"TASKS_TEMPLATE":"%s"}\n' \
+            "$(json_escape "$FEATURE_DIR")" "$json_docs" "$(json_escape "${TASKS_TEMPLATE:-}")"
+    fi
+else
+    echo "FEATURE_DIR: $FEATURE_DIR"
+    echo "TASKS_TEMPLATE: ${TASKS_TEMPLATE:-not found}"
+    echo "AVAILABLE_DOCS:"
+    check_file "$RESEARCH" "research.md"
+    check_file "$DATA_MODEL" "data-model.md"
+    check_dir "$CONTRACTS_DIR" "contracts/"
+    check_file "$QUICKSTART" "quickstart.md"
+fi

.specify/templates/checklist-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# [CHECKLIST TYPE] Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
+
+**Purpose**: [Brief description of what this checklist covers]
+**Created**: [DATE]
+**Feature**: [Link to spec.md or relevant documentation]
+
+**Note**: This checklist is generated by the `/speckit.checklist` command based on feature context and requirements.
+
+<!-- 
+  ============================================================================
+  IMPORTANT: The checklist items below are SAMPLE ITEMS for illustration only.
+  
+  The /speckit.checklist command MUST replace these with actual items based on:
+  - User's specific checklist request
+  - Feature requirements from spec.md
+  - Technical context from plan.md
+  - Implementation details from tasks.md
+  
+  DO NOT keep these sample items in the generated checklist file.
+  ============================================================================
+-->
+
+## [Category 1]
+
+- [ ] CHK001 First checklist item with clear action
+- [ ] CHK002 Second checklist item
+- [ ] CHK003 Third checklist item
+
+## [Category 2]
+
+- [ ] CHK004 Another category item
+- [ ] CHK005 Item with specific criteria
+- [ ] CHK006 Final item in this category
+
+## Notes
+
+- Check items off as completed: `[x]`
+- Add comments or findings inline
+- Link to relevant resources or documentation
+- Items are numbered sequentially for easy reference

.specify/templates/constitution-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# [PROJECT_NAME] Constitution
+<!-- Example: Spec Constitution, TaskFlow Constitution, etc. -->
+
+## Core Principles
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]
+<!-- Example: I. Library-First -->
+[PRINCIPLE_1_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Every feature starts as a standalone library; Libraries must be self-contained, independently testable, documented; Clear purpose required - no organizational-only libraries -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_2_NAME]
+<!-- Example: II. CLI Interface -->
+[PRINCIPLE_2_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Every library exposes functionality via CLI; Text in/out protocol: stdin/args → stdout, errors → stderr; Support JSON + human-readable formats -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_3_NAME]
+<!-- Example: III. Test-First (NON-NEGOTIABLE) -->
+[PRINCIPLE_3_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: TDD mandatory: Tests written → User approved → Tests fail → Then implement; Red-Green-Refactor cycle strictly enforced -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_4_NAME]
+<!-- Example: IV. Integration Testing -->
+[PRINCIPLE_4_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Focus areas requiring integration tests: New library contract tests, Contract changes, Inter-service communication, Shared schemas -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_5_NAME]
+<!-- Example: V. Observability, VI. Versioning & Breaking Changes, VII. Simplicity -->
+[PRINCIPLE_5_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Text I/O ensures debuggability; Structured logging required; Or: MAJOR.MINOR.BUILD format; Or: Start simple, YAGNI principles -->
+
+## [SECTION_2_NAME]
+<!-- Example: Additional Constraints, Security Requirements, Performance Standards, etc. -->
+
+[SECTION_2_CONTENT]
+<!-- Example: Technology stack requirements, compliance standards, deployment policies, etc. -->
+
+## [SECTION_3_NAME]
+<!-- Example: Development Workflow, Review Process, Quality Gates, etc. -->
+
+[SECTION_3_CONTENT]
+<!-- Example: Code review requirements, testing gates, deployment approval process, etc. -->
+
+## Governance
+<!-- Example: Constitution supersedes all other practices; Amendments require documentation, approval, migration plan -->
+
+[GOVERNANCE_RULES]
+<!-- Example: All PRs/reviews must verify compliance; Complexity must be justified; Use [GUIDANCE_FILE] for runtime development guidance -->
+
+**Version**: [CONSTITUTION_VERSION] | **Ratified**: [RATIFICATION_DATE] | **Last Amended**: [LAST_AMENDED_DATE]
+<!-- Example: Version: 2.1.1 | Ratified: 2025-06-13 | Last Amended: 2025-07-16 -->

.specify/templates/plan-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]
+
+**Branch**: `[###-feature-name]` | **Date**: [DATE] | **Spec**: [link]
+**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md`
+
+**Note**: This template is filled in by the `/speckit.plan` command. See `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` for the execution workflow.
+
+## Summary
+
+[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]
+
+## Technical Context
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the content in this section with the technical details
+  for the project. The structure here is presented in advisory capacity to guide
+  the iteration process.
+-->
+
+**Language/Version**: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
+**Primary Dependencies**: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
+**Storage**: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]  
+**Testing**: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
+**Target Platform**: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+**Project Type**: [e.g., library/cli/web-service/mobile-app/compiler/desktop-app or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
+**Performance Goals**: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
+**Constraints**: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]  
+**Scale/Scope**: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+
+## Constitution Check
+
+*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*
+
+[Gates determined based on constitution file]
+
+## Project Structure
+
+### Documentation (this feature)
+
+```text
+specs/[###-feature]/
+├── plan.md              # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
+├── research.md          # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
+├── data-model.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
+├── quickstart.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
+├── contracts/           # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
+└── tasks.md             # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)
+```
+
+### Source Code (repository root)
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the placeholder tree below with the concrete layout
+  for this feature. Delete unused options and expand the chosen structure with
+  real paths (e.g., apps/admin, packages/something). The delivered plan must
+  not include Option labels.
+-->
+
+```text
+# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
+src/
+├── models/
+├── services/
+├── cli/
+└── lib/
+
+tests/
+├── contract/
+├── integration/
+└── unit/
+
+# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
+backend/
+├── src/
+│   ├── models/
+│   ├── services/
+│   └── api/
+└── tests/
+
+frontend/
+├── src/
+│   ├── components/
+│   ├── pages/
+│   └── services/
+└── tests/
+
+# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
+api/
+└── [same as backend above]
+
+ios/ or android/
+└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]
+```
+
+**Structure Decision**: [Document the selected structure and reference the real
+directories captured above]
+
+## Complexity Tracking
+
+> **Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified**
+
+| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
+|-----------|------------|-------------------------------------|
+| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
+| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |

.specify/templates/spec-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
+
+**Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]`  
+**Created**: [DATE]  
+**Status**: Draft  
+**Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
+
+## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
+
+<!--
+  IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
+  Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
+  you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
+  
+  Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
+  Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
+  - Developed independently
+  - Tested independently
+  - Deployed independently
+  - Demonstrated to users independently
+-->
+
+### User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)
+
+[Describe this user journey in plain language]
+
+**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
+
+**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]
+
+**Acceptance Scenarios**:
+
+1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
+2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
+
+---
+
+### User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)
+
+[Describe this user journey in plain language]
+
+**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
+
+**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
+
+**Acceptance Scenarios**:
+
+1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
+
+---
+
+### User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)
+
+[Describe this user journey in plain language]
+
+**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
+
+**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
+
+**Acceptance Scenarios**:
+
+1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
+
+---
+
+[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]
+
+### Edge Cases
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
+  Fill them out with the right edge cases.
+-->
+
+- What happens when [boundary condition]?
+- How does system handle [error scenario]?
+
+## Requirements *(mandatory)*
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
+  Fill them out with the right functional requirements.
+-->
+
+### Functional Requirements
+
+- **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
+- **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]  
+- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
+- **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
+- **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]
+
+*Example of marking unclear requirements:*
+
+- **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
+- **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]
+
+### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
+
+- **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
+- **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]
+
+## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: Define measurable success criteria.
+  These must be technology-agnostic and measurable.
+-->
+
+### Measurable Outcomes
+
+- **SC-001**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
+- **SC-002**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
+- **SC-003**: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
+- **SC-004**: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]
+
+## Assumptions
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
+  Fill them out with the right assumptions based on reasonable defaults
+  chosen when the feature description did not specify certain details.
+-->
+
+- [Assumption about target users, e.g., "Users have stable internet connectivity"]
+- [Assumption about scope boundaries, e.g., "Mobile support is out of scope for v1"]
+- [Assumption about data/environment, e.g., "Existing authentication system will be reused"]
+- [Dependency on existing system/service, e.g., "Requires access to the existing user profile API"]

.specify/templates/tasks-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+---
+
+description: "Task list template for feature implementation"
+---
+
+# Tasks: [FEATURE NAME]
+
+**Input**: Design documents from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/`
+**Prerequisites**: plan.md (required), spec.md (required for user stories), research.md, data-model.md, contracts/
+
+**Tests**: The examples below include test tasks. Tests are OPTIONAL - only include them if explicitly requested in the feature specification.
+
+**Organization**: Tasks are grouped by user story to enable independent implementation and testing of each story.
+
+## Format: `[ID] [P?] [Story] Description`
+
+- **[P]**: Can run in parallel (different files, no dependencies)
+- **[Story]**: Which user story this task belongs to (e.g., US1, US2, US3)
+- Include exact file paths in descriptions
+
+## Path Conventions
+
+- **Single project**: `src/`, `tests/` at repository root
+- **Web app**: `backend/src/`, `frontend/src/`
+- **Mobile**: `api/src/`, `ios/src/` or `android/src/`
+- Paths shown below assume single project - adjust based on plan.md structure
+
+<!-- 
+  ============================================================================
+  IMPORTANT: The tasks below are SAMPLE TASKS for illustration purposes only.
+  
+  The /speckit.tasks command MUST replace these with actual tasks based on:
+  - User stories from spec.md (with their priorities P1, P2, P3...)
+  - Feature requirements from plan.md
+  - Entities from data-model.md
+  - Endpoints from contracts/
+  
+  Tasks MUST be organized by user story so each story can be:
+  - Implemented independently
+  - Tested independently
+  - Delivered as an MVP increment
+  
+  DO NOT keep these sample tasks in the generated tasks.md file.
+  ============================================================================
+-->
+
+## Phase 1: Setup (Shared Infrastructure)
+
+**Purpose**: Project initialization and basic structure
+
+- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan
+- [ ] T002 Initialize [language] project with [framework] dependencies
+- [ ] T003 [P] Configure linting and formatting tools
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Foundational (Blocking Prerequisites)
+
+**Purpose**: Core infrastructure that MUST be complete before ANY user story can be implemented
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: No user story work can begin until this phase is complete
+
+Examples of foundational tasks (adjust based on your project):
+
+- [ ] T004 Setup database schema and migrations framework
+- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication/authorization framework
+- [ ] T006 [P] Setup API routing and middleware structure
+- [ ] T007 Create base models/entities that all stories depend on
+- [ ] T008 Configure error handling and logging infrastructure
+- [ ] T009 Setup environment configuration management
+
+**Checkpoint**: Foundation ready - user story implementation can now begin in parallel
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: User Story 1 - [Title] (Priority: P1) 🎯 MVP
+
+**Goal**: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
+
+**Independent Test**: [How to verify this story works on its own]
+
+### Tests for User Story 1 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
+
+> **NOTE: Write these tests FIRST, ensure they FAIL before implementation**
+
+- [ ] T010 [P] [US1] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
+- [ ] T011 [P] [US1] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
+
+### Implementation for User Story 1
+
+- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create [Entity1] model in src/models/[entity1].py
+- [ ] T013 [P] [US1] Create [Entity2] model in src/models/[entity2].py
+- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py (depends on T012, T013)
+- [ ] T015 [US1] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
+- [ ] T016 [US1] Add validation and error handling
+- [ ] T017 [US1] Add logging for user story 1 operations
+
+**Checkpoint**: At this point, User Story 1 should be fully functional and testable independently
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: User Story 2 - [Title] (Priority: P2)
+
+**Goal**: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
+
+**Independent Test**: [How to verify this story works on its own]
+
+### Tests for User Story 2 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
+
+- [ ] T018 [P] [US2] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
+- [ ] T019 [P] [US2] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
+
+### Implementation for User Story 2
+
+- [ ] T020 [P] [US2] Create [Entity] model in src/models/[entity].py
+- [ ] T021 [US2] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py
+- [ ] T022 [US2] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
+- [ ] T023 [US2] Integrate with User Story 1 components (if needed)
+
+**Checkpoint**: At this point, User Stories 1 AND 2 should both work independently
+
+---
+
+## Phase 5: User Story 3 - [Title] (Priority: P3)
+
+**Goal**: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
+
+**Independent Test**: [How to verify this story works on its own]
+
+### Tests for User Story 3 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
+
+- [ ] T024 [P] [US3] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
+- [ ] T025 [P] [US3] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
+
+### Implementation for User Story 3
+
+- [ ] T026 [P] [US3] Create [Entity] model in src/models/[entity].py
+- [ ] T027 [US3] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py
+- [ ] T028 [US3] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
+
+**Checkpoint**: All user stories should now be independently functional
+
+---
+
+[Add more user story phases as needed, following the same pattern]
+
+---
+
+## Phase N: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
+
+**Purpose**: Improvements that affect multiple user stories
+
+- [ ] TXXX [P] Documentation updates in docs/
+- [ ] TXXX Code cleanup and refactoring
+- [ ] TXXX Performance optimization across all stories
+- [ ] TXXX [P] Additional unit tests (if requested) in tests/unit/
+- [ ] TXXX Security hardening
+- [ ] TXXX Run quickstart.md validation
+
+---
+
+## Dependencies & Execution Order
+
+### Phase Dependencies
+
+- **Setup (Phase 1)**: No dependencies - can start immediately
+- **Foundational (Phase 2)**: Depends on Setup completion - BLOCKS all user stories
+- **User Stories (Phase 3+)**: All depend on Foundational phase completion
+  - User stories can then proceed in parallel (if staffed)
+  - Or sequentially in priority order (P1 → P2 → P3)
+- **Polish (Final Phase)**: Depends on all desired user stories being complete
+
+### User Story Dependencies
+
+- **User Story 1 (P1)**: Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - No dependencies on other stories
+- **User Story 2 (P2)**: Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - May integrate with US1 but should be independently testable
+- **User Story 3 (P3)**: Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - May integrate with US1/US2 but should be independently testable
+
+### Within Each User Story
+
+- Tests (if included) MUST be written and FAIL before implementation
+- Models before services
+- Services before endpoints
+- Core implementation before integration
+- Story complete before moving to next priority
+
+### Parallel Opportunities
+
+- All Setup tasks marked [P] can run in parallel
+- All Foundational tasks marked [P] can run in parallel (within Phase 2)
+- Once Foundational phase completes, all user stories can start in parallel (if team capacity allows)
+- All tests for a user story marked [P] can run in parallel
+- Models within a story marked [P] can run in parallel
+- Different user stories can be worked on in parallel by different team members
+
+---
+
+## Parallel Example: User Story 1
+
+```bash
+# Launch all tests for User Story 1 together (if tests requested):
+Task: "Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py"
+Task: "Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py"
+
+# Launch all models for User Story 1 together:
+Task: "Create [Entity1] model in src/models/[entity1].py"
+Task: "Create [Entity2] model in src/models/[entity2].py"
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Strategy
+
+### MVP First (User Story 1 Only)
+
+1. Complete Phase 1: Setup
+2. Complete Phase 2: Foundational (CRITICAL - blocks all stories)
+3. Complete Phase 3: User Story 1
+4. **STOP and VALIDATE**: Test User Story 1 independently
+5. Deploy/demo if ready
+
+### Incremental Delivery
+
+1. Complete Setup + Foundational → Foundation ready
+2. Add User Story 1 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo (MVP!)
+3. Add User Story 2 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo
+4. Add User Story 3 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo
+5. Each story adds value without breaking previous stories
+
+### Parallel Team Strategy
+
+With multiple developers:
+
+1. Team completes Setup + Foundational together
+2. Once Foundational is done:
+   - Developer A: User Story 1
+   - Developer B: User Story 2
+   - Developer C: User Story 3
+3. Stories complete and integrate independently
+
+---
+
+## Notes
+
+- [P] tasks = different files, no dependencies
+- [Story] label maps task to specific user story for traceability
+- Each user story should be independently completable and testable
+- Verify tests fail before implementing
+- Commit after each task or logical group
+- Stop at any checkpoint to validate story independently
+- Avoid: vague tasks, same file conflicts, cross-story dependencies that break independence

AGENTS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+<!-- SPECKIT START -->
+For additional context about technologies to be used, project structure,
+shell commands, and other important information, read the current plan
+<!-- SPECKIT END -->