mirror of
https://github.com/domfelipe/vibeflow-n8n.git
synced 2026-08-07 07:36:46 +00:00
Record the public tag, released CLI and plugin smoke tests, final audit gate, and refreshed Codex for OSS evidence.
32 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
32 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
# v0.9.0 launch checklist
|
|
|
|
Released: 2026-07-23
|
|
|
|
## Release gate
|
|
|
|
- [x] VF010-VF013 implementation and configuration schema are complete.
|
|
- [x] Safe and unsafe refund fixtures are reproducible.
|
|
- [x] Local `npm run verify` and `npm audit --omit=dev` pass.
|
|
- [x] QA, adversarial Red Team, and Guardião reviews are documented.
|
|
- [x] Pull request CI passes on Node.js 20, 22, and 24.
|
|
- [x] Release commit is merged and tagged `v0.9.0`.
|
|
- [x] Released CLI and pinned Codex marketplace install successfully.
|
|
- [x] GitHub release is public and marked latest.
|
|
|
|
Release: <https://github.com/domfelipe/vibeflow-n8n/releases/tag/v0.9.0>
|
|
|
|
## Positioning
|
|
|
|
The launch message is: **dangerous outcomes are not limited to dangerous nodes**.
|
|
|
|
A normal HTTP, database, or messaging node can refund money, contact a customer, change access, or destroy data. Vibeflow v0.9 adds a preflight contract for the controls that should surround those outcomes: atomic idempotency, approval, amount and counterparty limits, durable audit, operator-visible failure paths, and recovery.
|
|
|
|
## Announcement
|
|
|
|
> Vibeflow v0.9 asks a more useful preflight question for generated n8n workflows: not only “is this valid JSON?” or “does it use a dangerous node?”, but “what can this workflow do in the real world if the input is messy or the model is wrong?”
|
|
>
|
|
> The new outcome contracts detect money, customer, privileged, and destructive-data actions — including ordinary HTTP nodes — and verify structural evidence for idempotency, approval, limits, durable audit, failure notification, and recovery. It is local, dependency-free, CI-friendly, and explicit about what still needs runtime enforcement.
|
|
|
|
Link to the repository and the safe/unsafe refund demo. Ask users for anonymized workflows, classifier false positives/negatives, and missing domain actions.
|
|
|
|
Ready-to-post Reddit and GitHub Discussion copy: [community-launch-v0.9.md](community-launch-v0.9.md).
|